Sagi you have now confused me completely. It's not modelling per se you object to, but modelling that you personally don't find tasteful?
I actually find Danica's picture more tasteful than the ones you posted. perhaps it's because she's more attractive....well I think she. The fist girl looks like she's on the way to an S&M party, which is fine if that's the looks she's after. But why is that ok but not Danica's ? I don't get that at all...
Not sure why the confusion.
We were talking specifically about that one picture of Ms. Parker splayed across the hood of that car. It's the combination of attire, setting and pose that I'm suggesting are sending out the wrong message to young women. Yes, she's pretty, she's sexy and in great shape; but, I couldn't care less that she's modelling, so much as I believe she's exploiting her sexuality.
Susie Wolff, on the other hand, is also posing/modelling, provocatively; but, as you can see, the context is different. It's not about the cars, or the blatant sexuality exuded by Danica Parker, it's about Ms. Wolff's femininity. That one is more attractive than the other, is really pretty subjective and not the issue here. I posted those pictures to show that you don't have to be naked to be sexy, nor do you have to be "open for business" to be provocative.
That's the difference, as far as I'm concerned.
...To answer a question you posed to cookie. Would you be happy if you're daughter was a model? If you addressed it to me I'd have no objections whatsoever.
Again, my question was based solely on that particular pose, in the particular context, in that particular attire, NOT modelling in general. I don't have a problem with modelling, in general, as it's just as honourable as any other profession. And, just like any other profession, choices and decisions need to be made as to what sort of image one wants to project.