FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#311064
You just dint get it Hammer, What exactly has Michael done wrong? DId he single handedly take blame for Williams woes during his time? only a moron would think this is the case! Williams problems did not begin nor resolve around one man.
Michaels role at McLaren has had no baring on pit stop or strategic errors like the lunacy of the op claims.
Just another stab in the back for Whitmarsh by the usual voices of reason and logic.

I really don't know why I bother with this place anymore it's rather annoying hearing the same old s*** over and over. I really like Lewis, I hope he stays but a major part of me wishes he'd f*** off so his loonies can f*** off with him.
#311065
So the best thing for Mclaren as stated by the voice of reason

Lewis leaves
Button therefore becomes the number one driver as there is no replacement in sight
Sam Michaels is doing a great job improving the team as he always has
Whitmarsh is ok, just a malicious witch hunt saying otherwise
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG AT MCLAREN
All is good at Woking!

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
#311066
You just dint get it Hammer, What exactly has Michael done wrong? DId he single handedly take blame for Williams woes during his time? only a moron would think this is the case! Williams problems did not begin nor resolve around one man.
Michaels role at McLaren has had no baring on pit stop or strategic errors like the lunacy of the op claims.
Just another stab in the back for Whitmarsh by the usual voices of reason and logic.

I really don't know why I bother with this place anymore it's rather annoying hearing the same old s*** over and over. I really like Lewis, I hope he stays but a major part of me wishes he'd f*** off so his loonies can f*** off with him.


Earlier in this thread you claim this place is fun due to the 'loonies' though you seem rather upset here. :hehe:

Again, it's a difference of opinion. Any of us can question anything about the sport, it's why we follow it. Why hire a guy who stepped down from a fast sinking team? He wasn't in demand, and Williams did not officially state that they wished he'd stayed either.

The reason he stepped down as I remember correctly was 'for the good and longetivity of Williams Racing' well this doesn't exactly spell "Sam Michael has been a huge asset!" to me!

My point being, we have EVERY right to question why Sam Michael is in McLaren, having proved nothing but the fact that Williams went on a FAST downhill slope the moment he took over Patrick Head's role. I remember him taking over the role right after the year Williams challenged Ferrari for the WDC (2003) and lost it. Never again did they come close. So, yes there IS some logic to questioning it, whether you like it or not.
#311067
So the best thing for Mclaren as stated by the voice of reason

Lewis leaves
Button therefore becomes the number one driver as there is no replacement in sight
Sam Michaels is doing a great job improving the team as he always has
Whitmarsh is ok, just a malicious witch hunt saying otherwise
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG AT MCLAREN
All is good at Woking!

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:


Yeah as opposed to Whitmarsh conspiracies bring back Ron cries, fire Jenson or make him a submissive bitch to the demigod known as Lewis. Your new savior....

Not hard to sound like the voice of reason with you around sausageface.
#311068
well said Hammer

We are not even questioning why Sam is at McLaren, now we are questioning why he has been anointed as future boss.

but ofcourse lets not forget

Nothings wrong at McLaren
Whitmasrh is doing a great Job
Its just bad luck
Sam is brilliant
you lot are pathetic

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
#311069
You just dint get it Hammer, What exactly has Michael done wrong? DId he single handedly take blame for Williams woes during his time? only a moron would think this is the case! Williams problems did not begin nor resolve around one man.
Michaels role at McLaren has had no baring on pit stop or strategic errors like the lunacy of the op claims.
Just another stab in the back for Whitmarsh by the usual voices of reason and logic.

I really don't know why I bother with this place anymore it's rather annoying hearing the same old s*** over and over. I really like Lewis, I hope he stays but a major part of me wishes he'd f*** off so his loonies can f*** off with him.


Earlier in this thread you claim this place is fun due to the 'loonies' though you seem rather upset here. :hehe:

Again, it's a difference of opinion. Any of us can question anything about the sport, it's why we follow it. Why hire a guy who stepped down from a fast sinking team? He wasn't in demand, and Williams did not officially state that they wished he'd stayed either.

The reason he stepped down as I remember correctly was 'for the good and longetivity of Williams Racing' well this doesn't exactly spell "Sam Michael has been a huge asset!" to me!

My point being, we have EVERY right to question why Sam Michael is in McLaren, having proved nothing but the fact that Williams went on a FAST downhill slope the moment he took over Patrick Head's role. I remember him taking over the role right after the year Williams challenged Ferrari for the WDC (2003) and lost it. Never again did they come close. So, yes there IS some logic to questioning it, whether you like it or not.

Who exactly came close to Ferrari in 04? Williams did better than McLaren then Williams problems began with the departure of BMW. 2005 was the beginning of the end for them and Michael took over and the wrong time, to suggest he is the root cause is idiocy.
#311070
Who exactly came close to Ferrari in 04? Williams did better than McLaren then Williams problems began with the departure of BMW. 2005 was the beginning of the end for them and Michael took over and the wrong time, to suggest he is the root cause is idiocy.


:rolleyes:

Beginning of the end for what reason?

Wrong time? Well, he definitely jumped ship to McLaren at the right time! But now that they've started making 'high profile errors' in the department which he's in charge off, I'm guessing your opinion is "Its at the wrong time!" again?

Come on man. :rolleyes:
#311072
What exactly is he in charge of in your mind? :banghead:


Keep banging your head mate.

"Just to be clear, our target is consistency and our target is not to have the fastest stationary time but to achieve the fastest average time," McLaren sporting director Sam Michael told the Vodafone McLaren Mercedes phone-in. "The internal target is to consistently achieve sub-three second pit stops for all the stops in the race. Consistency always has been our goal and all of the technology that we have added has actually been to add consistency rather than speed. We have gained speed at the same time but that's not our focus, in fact that's not at all our focus.

"This year at McLaren we have been on a technology and personnel ramp-up, we have introduced a lot of different parts in a short space of time - traffic light systems, faster jacking systems and also the retained wheelnuts. But the very nature of R&D is that you sometimes get things wrong and that's what happened to us in Valencia with the front jack failure. It was a mechanical failure, it had nothing to do with the operators. If you look back at the other teams that have introduced some of these items before us, they went through similar pain and some of them are still going through it."

Michael said a new jack is ready for this weekend's British Grand Prix.

"We identified why that failed and the design has been modified for Silverstone," he added. "On Monday this week, we completed 800 pit stops on the jacking systems with no faults at all with the new design. During a race weekend, we would probably do about 50 pit stops, including all of the practices, so effectively we've done 16 grand prix weekends on Monday. We believe that we have solved it, but at least we have done good due diligence on the new design for Silverstone. If we go there and have a fault we can go back and say that we have done as much as we could, which is what we do in engineering."

....What would you say falls within his scope of work again? It's spelt out and bolded for you.

Btw...his last line is so pathetic, almost like an excuse for any upcoming failures...and if this guy becomes boss of McLaren, let's change that sentence to "If anyone in this team fails, it's not my problem since I already told them what should be done". :hehe:

Bud sez:
I'm just confused, I thought it was all Whitmarshes fault, now it's Michaels? Are they co conspirators?

I explained this on the first page....thought you would've got it by now. :yawn:
Last edited by Hammer278 on 05 Jul 12, 12:09, edited 1 time in total.
#311074
You lot are pathetic!


Thats it? " You lot are pathetic" ? Thats a tad disappointing. :hehe:


To hear all blame fall on Whitmarsh now it's Michael, can't wait to hear who's next from the Lewis loonies! You guys make following F1 so much fun with your positivity filled posts.


Maybe you don't get it....people are questioning Whitmarsh for hiring Michael.

People are questioning Michael's ability.

See how they are related?

Btw, I think it's a bit unfair to put a label on those who think McLaren are not up to par....I could easily label you a McLaren loonie as well, but it'd be unfair. Nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion, I understand you're completely in love with the team and believe in everything they do - there's nothing wrong with that.


:yes:
#311075
What exactly is he in charge of in your mind? :banghead:


Keep banging your head mate.

"Just to be clear, our target is consistency and our target is not to have the fastest stationary time but to achieve the fastest average time," McLaren sporting director Sam Michael told the Vodafone McLaren Mercedes phone-in. "The internal target is to consistently achieve sub-three second pit stops for all the stops in the race. Consistency always has been our goal and all of the technology that we have added has actually been to add consistency rather than speed. We have gained speed at the same time but that's not our focus, in fact that's not at all our focus.

"This year at McLaren we have been on a technology and personnel ramp-up, we have introduced a lot of different parts in a short space of time - traffic light systems, faster jacking systems and also the retained wheelnuts. But the very nature of R&D is that you sometimes get things wrong and that's what happened to us in Valencia with the front jack failure. It was a mechanical failure, it had nothing to do with the operators. If you look back at the other teams that have introduced some of these items before us, they went through similar pain and some of them are still going through it."

Michael said a new jack is ready for this weekend's British Grand Prix.

"We identified why that failed and the design has been modified for Silverstone," he added. "On Monday this week, we completed 800 pit stops on the jacking systems with no faults at all with the new design. During a race weekend, we would probably do about 50 pit stops, including all of the practices, so effectively we've done 16 grand prix weekends on Monday. We believe that we have solved it, but at least we have done good due diligence on the new design for Silverstone. If we go there and have a fault we can go back and say that we have done as much as we could, which is what we do in engineering."

....What would you say falls within his scope of work again? It's spelt out and bolded for you.

Btw...his last line is so pathetic, almost like an excuse for any upcoming failures...and if this guy becomes boss of McLaren, let's change that sentence to "If anyone in this team fails, it's not my problem since I already told them what should be done". :hehe:

Bud sez:
I'm just confused, I thought it was all Whitmarshes fault, now it's Michaels? Are they co conspirators?

I explained this on the first page....thought you would've got it by now. :yawn:


I found out you can copy and paste, select text and make it bold. Still nothing that's says being sporting director makes him in charge of strategies or pit stop operations...
#311076
Just hopeless. :hehe:

You live in your fantasy world, I'll live in mine.
#311077
If Bud is 'disturbingly good looking' which I doubt, he could send his CV and photo to Whitmarsh and end up with a top role in the team on a fasttrack to team Boss
#311078
Can anybody provide a reference to the claim that sam michael has been tipped as future mclaren boss? I'm just curious if injen's younger brother is spouting his usual bull :censored: because there was no link or quotes from a source in the OP.

See our F1 related articles too!