FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Formula One related discussion.
#285878
What's Burning? wrote:I get why Ferrari is doing it... and taking all of it's Ferrari powered offspring with them. But can someone explain to me why Red Bull are doing it?...
I think they'd grown weary of all the insinuations they were in violation of RRA. If/when the rumours began affecting their ability to operate, the simplest, surest remedy would have been to leave FOTA.
#285881
Fred_C_Dobbs wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:I get why Ferrari is doing it... and taking all of it's Ferrari powered offspring with them. But can someone explain to me why Red Bull are doing it?...
I think they'd grown weary of all the insinuations they were in violation of RRA. If/when the rumours began affecting their ability to operate, the simplest, surest remedy would have been to leave FOTA.
Doesn't seem as if they're having a hard time operating within the confines though. I mean, why change the rules if they're working for you or I should say if you've made them work for you. I don't quite buy that explanation, there's got to be more going on.
#285887
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
#285890
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
#285892
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
But represents a team. We don't speak about FOTA comprising Whitmarsh, Domenicalli, Horner, etc etc, we speak about McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull etc etc being in FOTA. See?
#285895
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
But represents a team. We don't speak about FOTA comprising Whitmarsh, Domenicalli, Horner, etc etc, we speak about McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull etc etc being in FOTA. See?
:shrug: Just when I thought things were going swimmingly with us babe.....you pull this one :headshake::headshake::headshake:
#285899
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
But he represents a team. We don't speak about FOTA comprising Whitmarsh, Domenicalli, Horner, etc etc, we speak about McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull etc etc being in FOTA. See?
:shrug: Just when I thought things were going swimmingly with us babe.....you pull this one :headshake::headshake::headshake:
I'm just having a bit of fun ruining your Whitmarsh bashing. All good banter. :D

As someone at work likes to say "All good in the hood", which I find to be the most stupid saying as our workplace is not in a hood and he doesn't hail from the hood, unless he's referring to the hood on my hi-viz jacket. How's that for off topic?! :D
#285900
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
But he represents a team. We don't speak about FOTA comprising Whitmarsh, Domenicalli, Horner, etc etc, we speak about McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull etc etc being in FOTA. See?
:shrug: Just when I thought things were going swimmingly with us babe.....you pull this one :headshake::headshake::headshake:
I'm just having a bit of fun ruining your Whitmarsh bashing. All good banter. :D

As someone at work likes to say "All good in the hood", which I find to be the most stupid saying as our workplace is not in a hood and he doesn't hail from the hood, unless he's referring to the hood on my hi-viz jacket. How's that for off topic?! :D
I wasnt actually trying to bash him there, becuase I think the teams should stick together..............But good answer, you've redeemed yourself :D
#285903
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:
racechick wrote:Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates soon. :rofl::rofl:
You mean McLaren will be Billy No-mates soon.
No I meant what I said. Whitmarsh is head of it.
It's a body of teams not people so therefore saying Whitmarsh will be Billy No-mates is incorrect.
No its not, because he heads it.
But he represents a team. We don't speak about FOTA comprising Whitmarsh, Domenicalli, Horner, etc etc, we speak about McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull etc etc being in FOTA. See?
:shrug: Just when I thought things were going swimmingly with us babe.....you pull this one :headshake::headshake::headshake:
I'm just having a bit of fun ruining your Whitmarsh bashing. All good banter. :D

As someone at work likes to say "All good in the hood", which I find to be the most stupid saying as our workplace is not in a hood and he doesn't hail from the hood, unless he's referring to the hood on my hi-viz jacket. How's that for off topic?! :D
I wasnt actually trying to bash him there, becuase I think the teams should stick together..............But good answer, you've redeemed yourself :D
I'm surprised by my quick thinking - that blow to the head (I'm being serious, I have a cut) must have sped things up.
#285933
andrew wrote: I'm surprised by my quick thinking - that blow to the head (I'm being serious, I have a cut) must have sped things up.
Explains a lot. :)
#285938
bud wrote:F.O.T.A. = Formula One Teams Association

Not Formula One Team Principles Association. :yawn:
Jeez lighten up! Dont you start as well.
#286010
OK. I'll spell it out :P Yes its the teams association, Id got that bit. But I dont see mechanics, engineers, drivers, chassis, engines, physiotherapists, removal men, caterers, PR people, tyres,etc, etc, etc sitting round the table during meetings. The person doing that, who will be left with no-one to talk to if teams continue to leave, will be the person who heads the FOTA group...and it happens to be Whitmarsh. :rolleyes:
#286014
But who are you going to pick to represent the team? Team principal obviously... you can't send them all in! :hehe:
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!