- 09 Mar 11, 20:05#243314
I completely disagree. Funding, structure and facilities were already there. They would not have had the mad dash of the Campos-HRT transition and a huge management reshuffle right before the start of a new season and their finances should have seen them covered for the year, not having to give every driver with a big wallet a chance in the car just so that they could survive until the end of the year.
I wonder if Red Bull racing got this much hatred for being new in 2005.Is there no chance they can grow?
It's not hatred for being new, it's hatred for being such a mess. Lola, Prodrive and Epsilon Euskadi are all highly professional organisations and all had facilities in-place, being more prepared for an F1 entry, yet they were turned down for Campos who are now proving to be a bit of a joke.
Ah but just because those organisations are more established racing wise does that really mean they could produce a mid-pack or even better F1 car? They would still be newbies and to assume they would be better is abit presumptuous imho. Would their learning curve be any different, I think not.
I completely disagree. Funding, structure and facilities were already there. They would not have had the mad dash of the Campos-HRT transition and a huge management reshuffle right before the start of a new season and their finances should have seen them covered for the year, not having to give every driver with a big wallet a chance in the car just so that they could survive until the end of the year.
