FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#214502
So F1 is run by teams of 2 similar cars and it stands to reason that on the grid and race they will be in close proximity to each other. It's great to see team mates battle it out like we've seen on several occasions this season but I fear that if the teams can avoid the possibility of their cars taking each other out by direct instruction they will. Hell, drivers like Alonso would have it written into contracts. Consequently a huge amount of on track racing will disappear and we'll be forced to sit through radio transmissions of driver (a) being told to move over for driver (b). Great! Just what I want to see on a SUNDAY afternoon. I say ban pit to car radios and keep the team order ban to prevent race manipulation. Believe me, legal or not, the last thing I want to see is any car blatantly moving over for another.


Banning radio communication is totally out of place.

Um. Why? They did just fine without radios back in the day. If we say "it's okay to have team orders because they did it all the time in the past", why is the same rationale "completely out of place" with regards to pit-to-car radio?
#214503
A message to everyone that has posted along these lines:-
- The rule exists
- I accept the inuendo/inconclusive evidence that a team order was given
- Ferrari and their drivers should loose those the points.

Now that the WMSC, in their decision has accepted Ferrari's submission that Team Orders were used in the past. Ferrari specifically documented Germany 2008 Lewser and HK. Therefore it is now confirmed that Lewser used team orders to pass HK in Germany 08.

Given this, every person who posted that Ferrari and its drivers should loose points, must now agree that Lewser is not the 2008 World Champion, and that Felipe is the rightful 2008 world champion.

Please use the drivers correct name, your comments are inflammatory and will not be tolerated!
#214504
A message to everyone that has posted along these lines:-
- The rule exists
- I accept the inuendo/inconclusive evidence that a team order was given
- Ferrari and their drivers should loose those the points.

Now that the WMSC, in their decision has accepted Ferrari's submission that Team Orders were used in the past. Ferrari specifically documented Germany 2008 Lewser and HK. Therefore it is now confirmed that Lewser used team orders to pass HK in Germany 08.

Given this, every person who posted that Ferrari and its drivers should loose points, must now agree that Lewser is not the 2008 World Champion, and that Felipe is the rightful 2008 world champion.

Please use the drivers correct name, your comments are inflammatory and will not be tolerated!


I knew that post would touch a nerve, but the fact is, there is a lot of bleating and complaining about Germany 2010, but, the truth that everyone knows, if you accept those complaints as true, is that Felipe is the real WDC for 2008. I'm simply stating it should be made official - if you believe the recent bleatings about team orders.
Last edited by spankyham on 11 Sep 10, 03:38, edited 1 time in total.
#214507
don't have an issue with team orders per-se; it's more how their implemented; using team orders when one driver is 38 points ahead at race 11 of 20 is unnecessary and detrimental to the sport and damages the reputation of the sport further. If one driver has very little chance of winning the title after say 15 or 16 races out of 20 then it makes sense to use team orders. Uneducated fans or not; they are the ones that put their hard earned cash down and attend races; people will not bother attending if they believe that they are going to see a sham race, without the fans, the sport is literally nothing; many fans see the FIA as taking them for fools!


Yes, you do have valid points.
They way they are implemented should be not detrimental to the sport in general... but perhaps the problem is in how some want to make team orders seem as an evil curse inherited from the ice ages striking modern F1 once a decade; when it fact its perfectly reasonable and happens all the time in many different ways.

The other issue is: at which point or under which circumstances can they be "accepted" as reasonable...
Lets say last yr after Massa got injured... according to the rule the team should not have used team orders to pull in favour of Kimi... hmmm something's definitely wrong. The rule itelf does not consider timing or circunstances around it. Teams dont look for "very little" or "very good chance", they go for straight numbers: what will be the immediate best result? The teams face the situation, weights pros-cons and make decisions based on the collective interest at the moment. Always. All the teams.

Other than that... how to regulated it to make it fair for everyone involved while not being insulting to the fans or teams... now that's the puzzle.
#214508
Banning radio communication is totally out of place.

Um. Why? They did just fine without radios back in the day. If we say "it's okay to have team orders because they did it all the time in the past", why is the same rationale "completely out of place" with regards to pit-to-car radio?


Good point.
But there's an even better answer: SAFETY.
#214511
A message to everyone that has posted along these lines:-
- The rule exists
- I accept the inuendo/inconclusive evidence that a team order was given
- Ferrari and their drivers should loose those the points.

Now that the WMSC, in their decision has accepted Ferrari's submission that Team Orders were used in the past. Ferrari specifically documented Germany 2008 Lewser and HK. Therefore it is now confirmed that Lewser used team orders to pass HK in Germany 08.

Given this, every person who posted that Ferrari and its drivers should loose points, must now agree that Lewser is not the 2008 World Champion, and that Felipe is the rightful 2008 world champion.

Please use the drivers correct name, your comments are inflammatory and will not be tolerated!

I knew that post would touch a nerve, but the fact is, there is a lot of bleating and complaining about Germany 2010, but, the truth that everyone knows is that Felipe is the real WDC for 2008. I'm simply stating it should be made official.

But Lewis Hamilton was robbed of four points at Spa Francorchamps 2008 when he was given a post race 25 second penalty dropping him to third for gaining an advantage by cutting a corner despite giving the position back to Raikkonen only to take the position back going into La Source. The rules state that if a position is gained by cutting a corner, that position needs to be relinquished to the driver passed by cutting a corner, which Hamilton did, there was no rule that states the driver that cut the corner and gained an advantage must wait for a number of corners before attempting to pass again! Again the inconsistent stewardship cost a driver dear. Bottom line is if Hamilton was not penalised for following the rulebook, he would have still won the championship even if HK didn't let him pass!

PS: I am not a Lewis Hamilton fan, but I like to see fair play; which is sadly unforthcoming with the inconsistent stewardship in F1!

don't have an issue with team orders per-se; it's more how their implemented; using team orders when one driver is 38 points ahead at race 11 of 20 is unnecessary and detrimental to the sport and damages the reputation of the sport further. If one driver has very little chance of winning the title after say 15 or 16 races out of 20 then it makes sense to use team orders. Uneducated fans or not; they are the ones that put their hard earned cash down and attend races; people will not bother attending if they believe that they are going to see a sham race, without the fans, the sport is literally nothing; many fans see the FIA as taking them for fools!

Yes, you do have valid points.
They way they are implemented should be not detrimental to the sport in general... but perhaps the problem is in how some want to make team orders seem as an evil curse inherited from the ice ages striking modern F1 once a decade; when it fact its perfectly reasonable and happens all the time in many different ways.

The other issue is: at which point or under which circumstances can they be "accepted" as reasonable...
Lets say last yr after Massa got injured... according to the rule the team should not have used team orders to pull in favour of Kimi... hmmm something's definitely wrong. The rule itelf does not consider timing or circunstances around it. Teams dont look for "very little" or "very good chance", they go for straight numbers: what will be the immediate best result? The teams face the situation, weights pros-cons and make decisions based on the collective interest at the moment. Always. All the teams.

Other than that... how to regulated it to make it fair for everyone involved while not being insulting to the fans or teams... now that's the puzzle.

Team orders; are they evil? NO! But at the same time they do deprive the fans of what they want to see; e.g. wheel to wheel racing; back in the early 90s; the racing was great, team mates going wheel to wheel until one driver is out of the hunt; drivers had the ability to go wheel to wheel without crashing back then; why do drivers not have that ability now? In my opinion, team orders should not come into play until at least 70 -75% of the season has passed unless extenuating circumstances exist like a driver gets injured and a replacement comes in mid-season or one driver is more than four race wins behind. Just a few suggestions; I don't like teams that have clear #1 and #2 drivers swapping positions in the first half of the season without reason! Yes it is a tricky situation but having teams free to implement team orders from the outset is not good!
#214513
...Anyway, for those of you saying team orders have been around for last 60 years... times change....

The reason they've been around for 60 years is simple. They work. The team profit by having a driver behave in the best interest of the team and not of himself. Unless and until that changes, they won't be going away.

...If F1 is supposed to be a team sport then why do we have a drivers championship? The drivers championship completely goes against the spirit of a "team sport" - how can there be a drivers championship if both (same team) drivers can not battle for position or one is given preference....

I gather you never have seen a bicycle race. That most certainly is a team sport but only one racer is declared the winner. Yes, they also crown the best team (much like F1) but far and away the greater glory goes to the individual winner.

To those of you who oppose Team Orders, at this station it must be clear all your complaints have fallen on deaf ears -- the FIA will not enforce the rule and the rest of us disagree -- so why do you continue to waste those precious dead dinosaurs raising your objections?

Or equestrian events or gymnastics or fencing or ski jumping or biathlon or cross country skiing or swimming or relays or ...
#214515
Spankyham Didn't kimi move aside for massa in japan 08 ? Didn't massa and kimi trade places in brazil 07? By your reasoning we should give the 07 title to Lewis!

There's a logical argument then there's emotional driven bullpoo, you posted with the latter!
#214516
A message to everyone that has posted along these lines:-
- The rule exists
- I accept the inuendo/inconclusive evidence that a team order was given
- Ferrari and their drivers should loose those the points.

Now that the WMSC, in their decision has accepted Ferrari's submission that Team Orders were used in the past. Ferrari specifically documented Germany 2008 Lewser and HK. Therefore it is now confirmed that Lewser used team orders to pass HK in Germany 08.

Given this, every person who posted that Ferrari and its drivers should loose points, must now agree that Lewser is not the 2008 World Champion, and that Felipe is the rightful 2008 world champion.

Please use the drivers correct name, your comments are inflammatory and will not be tolerated!

I knew that post would touch a nerve, but the fact is, there is a lot of bleating and complaining about Germany 2010, but, the truth that everyone knows is that Felipe is the real WDC for 2008. I'm simply stating it should be made official.

But Lewis Hamilton was robbed of four points at Spa Francorchamps 2008 when he was given a post race 25 second penalty dropping him to third for gaining an advantage by cutting a corner despite giving the position back to Raikkonen only to take the position back going into La Source. The rules state that if a position is gained by cutting a corner, that position needs to be relinquished to the driver passed by cutting a corner, which Hamilton did, there was no rule that states the driver that cut the corner and gained an advantage must wait for a number of corners before attempting to pass again! Again the inconsistent stewardship cost a driver dear. Bottom line is if Hamilton was not penalised for following the rulebook, he would have still won the championship even if HK didn't let him pass!

PS: I am not a Lewis Hamilton fan, but I like to see fair play; which is sadly unforthcoming with the inconsistent stewardship in F1!

don't have an issue with team orders per-se; it's more how their implemented; using team orders when one driver is 38 points ahead at race 11 of 20 is unnecessary and detrimental to the sport and damages the reputation of the sport further. If one driver has very little chance of winning the title after say 15 or 16 races out of 20 then it makes sense to use team orders. Uneducated fans or not; they are the ones that put their hard earned cash down and attend races; people will not bother attending if they believe that they are going to see a sham race, without the fans, the sport is literally nothing; many fans see the FIA as taking them for fools!

Yes, you do have valid points.
They way they are implemented should be not detrimental to the sport in general... but perhaps the problem is in how some want to make team orders seem as an evil curse inherited from the ice ages striking modern F1 once a decade; when it fact its perfectly reasonable and happens all the time in many different ways.

The other issue is: at which point or under which circumstances can they be "accepted" as reasonable...
Lets say last yr after Massa got injured... according to the rule the team should not have used team orders to pull in favour of Kimi... hmmm something's definitely wrong. The rule itelf does not consider timing or circunstances around it. Teams dont look for "very little" or "very good chance", they go for straight numbers: what will be the immediate best result? The teams face the situation, weights pros-cons and make decisions based on the collective interest at the moment. Always. All the teams.

Other than that... how to regulated it to make it fair for everyone involved while not being insulting to the fans or teams... now that's the puzzle.

Team orders; are they evil? NO! But at the same time they do deprive the fans of what they want to see; e.g. wheel to wheel racing; back in the early 90s; the racing was great, team mates going wheel to wheel until one driver is out of the hunt; drivers had the ability to go wheel to wheel without crashing back then; why do drivers not have that ability now? In my opinion, team orders should not come into play until at least 70 -75% of the season has passed unless extenuating circumstances exist like a driver gets injured and a replacement comes in mid-season or one driver is more than four race wins behind. Just a few suggestions; I don't like teams that have clear #1 and #2 drivers swapping positions in the first half of the season without reason! Yes it is a tricky situation but having teams free to implement team orders from the outset is not good!

Some such solution will possibly be instated.
On the other hand, no half-way knowledgeable F1 fan would be surprised if HK had to move over for LH from race five on or so because it's just reality based on points, contract, etc. It would happen rarely enough during races anyway if indeed the difference between the drivers is so great - the 'designated' number two driver just doesn't get into a position where he's leading his main man w/o some third-party driver in between. And if it indeed happens (see RB vs. MS) then every rational F1 fan should expect a swap of positions for the good of the team spirit and driver championship.
If a team elects to hire two closely matched drivers, then the public would expect a different scenario and they virtually never get disappointed by such teams as they usually let them race for about half a season or so until a decision needs to be made based on point standings.
#214520
A message to everyone that has posted along these lines:-
- The rule exists
- I accept the inuendo/inconclusive evidence that a team order was given
- Ferrari and their drivers should loose those the points.

Now that the WMSC, in their decision has accepted Ferrari's submission that Team Orders were used in the past. Ferrari specifically documented Germany 2008 Lewser and HK. Therefore it is now confirmed that Lewser used team orders to pass HK in Germany 08.

Given this, every person who posted that Ferrari and its drivers should loose points, must now agree that Lewser is not the 2008 World Champion, and that Felipe is the rightful 2008 world champion.

Please use the drivers correct name, your comments are inflammatory and will not be tolerated!

I knew that post would touch a nerve, but the fact is, there is a lot of bleating and complaining about Germany 2010, but, the truth that everyone knows is that Felipe is the real WDC for 2008. I'm simply stating it should be made official.

But Lewis Hamilton was robbed of four points at Spa Francorchamps 2008 when he was given a post race 25 second penalty dropping him to third for gaining an advantage by cutting a corner despite giving the position back to Raikkonen only to take the position back going into La Source. The rules state that if a position is gained by cutting a corner, that position needs to be relinquished to the driver passed by cutting a corner, which Hamilton did, there was no rule that states the driver that cut the corner and gained an advantage must wait for a number of corners before attempting to pass again! Again the inconsistent stewardship cost a driver dear. Bottom line is if Hamilton was not penalised for following the rulebook, he would have still won the championship even if HK didn't let him pass!

PS: I am not a Lewis Hamilton fan, but I like to see fair play; which is sadly unforthcoming with the inconsistent stewardship in F1!



Hmm, Spa '08, nice try, but wrong. Firstly, the rules states you can't gain a place by going off track. Lewis went off track and gained a place. There is noting in the rules about giving the place back. It has been the practice, sometimes, of the stewards to, at their discretion, to let a driver "give back/negate what they have gain" This is not written in the rules, but is a "interpretation" by the officials. So, the ruling was 100% correct and Lewis deserved the penalty (rare for Lewis to get an actual penalty rather than his customary endless warnings).
Also, if you were going to try and argue that the officials should have applied the same discretion, you would need to show that Lewis negated what he had gained by going off track. Clearly that argument could not be sustained. If you watch, Lewis barely slowed to just under Kimi's speed, ducked under his rear wing, grabbed a nice tow and got the sling ahead into the next corner. No-one in their wildest dreams could argue he could possibly have been in that position to grab that tow and be that close if he had, like he should have, fallen behind Kimi instead of cutting the corner.

P.S. You'll note I edited my original post on Team Orders, in case it wasn't completely clear that I don't in any way support the current ridiculous TO rule. I was making the point that those who did want it applied should now support the view that Felipe is rightful 2008 WDC.
#214521
On the other hand, no half-way knowledgeable F1 fan would be surprised if HK had to move over for LH from race five on or so because it's just reality based on points, contract, etc. It would happen rarely enough during races anyway if indeed the difference between the drivers is so great - the 'designated' number two driver just doesn't get into a position where he's leading his main man w/o some third-party driver in between. And if it indeed happens (see RB vs. MS) then every rational F1 fan should expect a swap of positions for the good of the team spirit and driver championship.
If a team elects to hire two closely matched drivers, then the public would expect a different scenario and they virtually never get disappointed by such teams as they usually let them race for about half a season or so until a decision needs to be made based on point standings.


So, for McLaren its ok because they apply rigid team orders from the start of the season? Also, you've conveniently forgotten France and England where HK also moved over for Lewis in the same year.

Even if you leave that aside explain this:-
Lewis to Team "Will Jensen pass me"
Team to Lewis "No"
You may recognise this from Turkey this year. That is the radio conversation just before the infamous "fuel is critical Jensen, fuel is critical!!!"
How could the McLaren team know what Jensen would do if there wasn't a team order?
Unlike the the Ferrari incident at Germany which requires interpretation of what Rob Smedley meant in his communications, ie no concrete evidence. This is 100% proof. And although the British Race Director Charlie Whiting for some reason did not react to that, the WMSC, in their decision, stated they acknowledged that Team Orders had occurred in other races as per Ferrari's submission. (Ferrari had submitted Turkey 2010 as an example of Team Orders).
#214522
Spankyham Didn't kimi move aside for massa in japan 08 ? Didn't massa and kimi trade places in brazil 07? By your reasoning we should give the 07 title to Lewis!

There's a logical argument then there's emotional driven bullpoo, you posted with the latter!


Thanks for the swearing mate, just proves you know you can't win with logic.
If you accept Kimi moving in Japan and Brazil then I'll remind you of France and Britain where HK moved over for Lewis.

On the strength of this, if you are in the camp that Ferrari should have lost points for Germany, then you have take all the points away from all the team orders. And sadly for the Lewis supporters who have been pushing that barrow, it actually comes home and bites you hard because it proves Felipe is the 2008 WDC.

You can add that McLaren should be docked for Turkey this year and every time we've heard "fuel is critical" :)

P.S. I don't mind your personal attack on me, but, the swearing isn't good for the younger ones who see this forum.
#214523
On the other hand, no half-way knowledgeable F1 fan would be surprised if HK had to move over for LH from race five on or so because it's just reality based on points, contract, etc. It would happen rarely enough during races anyway if indeed the difference between the drivers is so great - the 'designated' number two driver just doesn't get into a position where he's leading his main man w/o some third-party driver in between. And if it indeed happens (see RB vs. MS) then every rational F1 fan should expect a swap of positions for the good of the team spirit and driver championship.
If a team elects to hire two closely matched drivers, then the public would expect a different scenario and they virtually never get disappointed by such teams as they usually let them race for about half a season or so until a decision needs to be made based on point standings.


So, for McLaren its ok because they apply rigid team orders from the start of the season? Also, you've conveniently forgotten France and England where HK also moved over for Lewis in the same year.

Even if you leave that aside explain this:-
Lewis to Team "Will Jensen pass me"
Team to Lewis "No"
You may recognise this from Turkey this year. That is the radio conversation just before the infamous "fuel is critical Jensen, fuel is critical!!!"
How could the McLaren team know what Jensen would do if there wasn't a team order?
Unlike the the Ferrari incident at Germany which requires interpretation of what Rob Smedley meant in his communications, ie no concrete evidence. This is 100% proof. And although the British Race Director Charlie Whiting for some reason did not react to that, the WMSC, in their decision, stated they acknowledged that Team Orders had occurred in other races as per Ferrari's submission. (Ferrari had submitted Turkey 2010 as an example of Team Orders).

I'm not sure or entirely fail to see where and how we disagree here - please enlighten me as to what you're arguing here against my statement...
#214524

P.S. I don't mind your personal attack on me, but, the swearing isn't good for the younger ones who see this forum.

True, but neither is the use of derogatory terms for drivers and teams. So, please, the both of you: :director: keep it civil!
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 21

See our F1 related articles too!