About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
oh merda, allora:
1- don't answer me with an another question
2- the FIA ESCUSED WITH FERRARI for hadn't provided that document, each decision has to be signed by each team, Ferrari did not had that document and they didn't signed it..otherwise they would have done it!! and they would have respected it!
now answer if you can please...
1- the decision of the FIA of starting with heavy rains, as every decision made by the FIA must be undersigned by each team, and Ferrari didn't. We will understand(or maybe not) what happened in the next hours, but that's a sad point for the FIA.
2- why that penalty to kubica for colliding with LH? this is the game, this is motorsports, he didn't done it intentionally, but most of all, LH was still in race after it although he lost a position. so why ralf hasn't been punished for the collision with Yamamoto with a 10 position shift? maybe becuase none of them is a 20 year old leader of the championship..
but I find it quite sad to see such bitterness around the forum after such an entertaining and eventful race showing for the most a lot of extreme driving skill from all the drivers.
2- the FIA ESCUSED WITH FERRARI for hadn't provided that document, each decision has to be signed by each team, Ferrari did not had that document and they didn't signed it..otherwise they would have done it!! and they would have respected it!
i would discuss two things:
1- the decision of the FIA of starting with heavy rains, as every decision made by the FIA must be undersigned by each team, and Ferrari didn't. We will understand(or maybe not) what happened in the next hours, but that's a sad point for the FIA.
The truth is Ferrari have manipulated the computers to make it seem they did not know about intermediate, or wet - not super-wet - tyres being banned for the start.
They make mistakes with Massa's pitstops. Massa overtakes under the safety car, and then tries to do his drive-through penalty under the safety car. When Massa was ahead of Raikkonen and they brought Massa in, I thought it was a tactical move to let Raikkonen ahead, but when I saw the fuel gone in, I thought what a bunch of arses. How they must be missing Schumacher and Ross Brawn.
I wondered if they had stuffed up the fuel calcuations as the Massa pit-stop tactics were mighty odd. I feel a little sorry for Raikkonen and Massa as both had a chance of better finishes today, but it seems team tactics scuppered them both.
i would discuss two things:
1- the decision of the FIA of starting with heavy rains, as every decision made by the FIA must be undersigned by each team, and Ferrari didn't. We will understand(or maybe not) what happened in the next hours, but that's a sad point for the FIA.
I don't believe that Italian trash. Every other team knew, every other driver knew, all of the press knew. The truth is Ferrari have manipulated the computers to make it seem they did not know about intermediate, or wet - not super-wet - tyres being banned for the start. Ferrari are hardly the face of honesty and, furthermore, they've been given enough over the past few years, don't you think.Besides, the dopes made the wrong choice of tyres anyway.
See our F1 related articles too!