- 24 Sep 08, 21:44#67748
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
With SV changing to Red Bull, wouldn't it be prudent for Mateschitz to try to get the better engine into his main team and go for the jugular with the young lion?


Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
With SV changing to Red Bull, wouldn't it be prudent for Mateschitz to try to get the better engine into his main team and go for the jugular with the young lion?
With SV changing to Red Bull, wouldn't it be prudent for Mateschitz to try to get the better engine into his main team and go for the jugular with the young lion?
May not matter with the return to more Mechanical grip - I no that's a point easily argued against. The Renault engine surely lacks horsepower, but surely they can try to invest in it like other teams have.
With SV changing to Red Bull, wouldn't it be prudent for Mateschitz to try to get the better engine into his main team and go for the jugular with the young lion?
May not matter with the return to more Mechanical grip - I no that's a point easily argued against. The Renault engine surely lacks horsepower, but surely they can try to invest in it like other teams have.
At least you're away your point can be easily encountered. I always use the McLaren MP4-8 in these situations. The chassis of this car was brilliant, but had a Ford engine which was completely useless. If that chassis had, say, the Renault engine attached, it would have won more races and been a serious title contender.
The contractual situation however, could throw in a monkey wrench. Simply canceling a Renault contract may be too expensive. The simpler solution would be an in-house swap.
With SV changing to Red Bull, wouldn't it be prudent for Mateschitz to try to get the better engine into his main team and go for the jugular with the young lion?
May not matter with the return to more Mechanical grip - I no that's a point easily argued against. The Renault engine surely lacks horsepower, but surely they can try to invest in it like other teams have.
At least you're away your point can be easily encountered. I always use the McLaren MP4-8 in these situations. The chassis of this car was brilliant, but had a Ford engine which was completely useless. If that chassis had, say, the Renault engine attached, it would have won more races and been a serious title contender.
Indeed it was the 1993 Mclaren Ford that I thought of when I answered that.
But I'd say that the Renault ain't as far behind as the Ford was back then?
The difference is rumoured to be 30 horsepower between the Renault and Ferrari units. The BMW and Mercedes' powerplants are of a similar standard, although the Mercedes' engine seems to have a nicer torque curve. 30 horsepower is a hell of a lot.
The difference is rumoured to be 30 horsepower between the Renault and Ferrari units. The BMW and Mercedes' powerplants are of a similar standard, although the Mercedes' engine seems to have a nicer torque curve. 30 horsepower is a hell of a lot.
Interestingly, it didn't seem to push the cars along as fast as the BMW did at Monza at times. I mean, through that particular speed-trap, the Ferrari-powered cars filled-out the top eight anyway, but the BMW did seem to have the advantage over the Mercedes. It could also have been down to aero-levels, though, so it's not really an accurate comparison, unfortunately.
See our F1 related articles too!