FORUMula1.com

[What's Burning?]

It's obvious that the problem is two fold, you have a rule that's difficult to implement because there's not clear way to police it, hence it's a farce. While at the same time that rule is there to give some semblance of *sport* to the sport, otherwise we have fans watching pre-determined results and leading to team orders to create a safety car situation at the expense of one driver to benefit the other driver... sound familiar?

Regardless of which side you're on, the rule IS the problem.

I suspect that the generalized rule of no team orders will not be there next year and it will be replaced by a handful of clear cut rules preventing certain explicit actions that could be given as a team order.

The only gain here would probably be more transparent radio communications next season.

[f1ea]

Different thing.

Not to the rule.

[darwin dali]

It's obvious that the problem is two fold, you have a rule that's difficult to implement because there's not clear way to police it, hence it's a farce. While at the same time that rule is there to give some semblance of *sport* to the sport, otherwise we have fans watching pre-determined results and leading to team orders to create a safety car situation at the expense of one driver to benefit the other driver... sound familiar?

Regardless of which side you're on, the rule IS the problem.

I suspect that the generalized rule of no team orders will not be there next year and it will be replaced by a handful of clear cut rules preventing certain explicit actions that could be given as a team order.

The only gain here would probably be more transparent radio communications next season.

rules preventing certain explicit actions that could be given as a team order.

Such as?

As of Hungary 2010, no radio communications can be vetoed by teams from being broadcast.

[What's Burning?]

It's obvious that the problem is two fold, you have a rule that's difficult to implement because there's not clear way to police it, hence it's a farce. While at the same time that rule is there to give some semblance of *sport* to the sport, otherwise we have fans watching pre-determined results and leading to team orders to create a safety car situation at the expense of one driver to benefit the other driver... sound familiar?

Regardless of which side you're on, the rule IS the problem.

I suspect that the generalized rule of no team orders will not be there next year and it will be replaced by a handful of clear cut rules preventing certain explicit actions that could be given as a team order.

The only gain here would probably be more transparent radio communications next season.

rules preventing certain explicit actions that could be given as a team order.

Such as?

As of Hungary 2010, no radio communications can be vetoed by teams from being broadcast.

Not all team orders are given via radio... Renault's crash-gate wasn't.

[smokin]

WMSC hearing Sep 8.