FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By Jensonb
#174062
it doesn't cost as much as you think.... to broadcast HD.

Why make programs like Eastenders available in HD... pfft

F1 owns eastenders,,,

Broadcasting is not the problem. Bernie has so far failed to invest in HD equipment to shoot the bloody races.
By RyRy
#174073
it doesn't cost as much as you think.... to broadcast HD.

Why make programs like Eastenders available in HD... pfft

F1 owns eastenders,,,

Broadcasting is not the problem. Bernie has so far failed to invest in HD equipment to shoot the bloody races.


ALL the camera's they use are capable of HD just the broadcasting is the problem. Nearly ALL of the TV shows/programs/films..etc are in HD but not broadcast due to licenses, cost and because of stability and stuff...
User avatar
By Jensonb
#174135
it doesn't cost as much as you think.... to broadcast HD.

Why make programs like Eastenders available in HD... pfft

F1 owns eastenders,,,

Broadcasting is not the problem. Bernie has so far failed to invest in HD equipment to shoot the bloody races.


ALL the camera's they use are capable of HD just the broadcasting is the problem. Nearly ALL of the TV shows/programs/films..etc are in HD but not broadcast due to licenses, cost and because of stability and stuff...

The cameras may be capable (And not all of them are), but they are not shooting in HD, and Bernie is not offering an HD feed. If he was, the BBC would be using it.
User avatar
By headless
#174295
I dont think Tex knows what HD is :hehe:

Just because I'm older and wiser does not mean I'm ignorant :wink:

Tex is like a clueless Uncle!

I find your comment rather insulting.

Hahaha, a clueless Uncle everyone loves!
By Gaz
#174300
I dont think Tex knows what HD is :hehe:

Just because I'm older and wiser does not mean I'm ignorant :wink:

Tex is like a clueless Uncle!

I find your comment rather insulting.

Hahaha, a clueless Uncle everyone loves!

:rofl:
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#174305
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.
User avatar
By bud
#174306
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.


that will be impressive
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#174312
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.


that will be impressive


Yeah, I think it's something that could be really good for live events.

A bit about the wold cup:
http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/marketing ... 43253.html
User avatar
By texasmr2
#174376
I dont think Tex knows what HD is :hehe:

Just because I'm older and wiser does not mean I'm ignorant :wink:

Tex is like a clueless Uncle!

I find your comment rather insulting.

Hahaha, a clueless Uncle everyone loves!

:rofl:

I was curious as to the intentions because you know abusing the elderly is a no-no! :hehe:
User avatar
By headless
#174379
Aye it is, I have loads of respect for the elderley.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#174380
I dont think Tex knows what HD is :hehe:

Just because I'm older and wiser does not mean I'm ignorant :wink:

Tex is like a clueless Uncle!

I find your comment rather insulting.

Hahaha, a clueless Uncle everyone loves!

:rofl:

I was curious as to the intentions because you know abusing the elderly is a no-no! :hehe:


Geriophilia, maybe not such a bad thing.
User avatar
By Jensonb
#174407
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.

Wow, how long is it going to take for people to realise 3D TV is as bad an idea as VR Video Games and/or Project Natal?
User avatar
By texasmr2
#174408
I dont think Tex knows what HD is :hehe:

Just because I'm older and wiser does not mean I'm ignorant :wink:

Tex is like a clueless Uncle!

I find your comment rather insulting.

Hahaha, a clueless Uncle everyone loves!

:rofl:

I was curious as to the intentions because you know abusing the elderly is a no-no! :hehe:


Geriophilia, maybe not such a bad thing.

That's what all you Necrophiliac's say :eek::hehe: !!!!!
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#174409
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.

Wow, how long is it going to take for people to realise 3D TV is as bad an idea as VR Video Games and/or Project Natal?


Care to elaborate?
User avatar
By Jensonb
#174422
Can't wait for it in HD 3D, Sony are working with FIFA to show some of the world cup in 3D in 2010 so it's not out the question to think it's far off for F1.

Wow, how long is it going to take for people to realise 3D TV is as bad an idea as VR Video Games and/or Project Natal?


Care to elaborate?

Well there is this assumption that increased immersion is always superior. It's actually not true. It's a bit like the theory of the uncanny valley in designing CG faces or androids. The quality of the experience increases in line with the increase in immersion up to a certain point near total immersion/hyper-reality and then it drops off.

For example, look at Tony Hawk: RIDE. Once you go too close to simulating reality exactly, but not completely, the little disparities become more frustrating. Another example is the critical flaw of VR & Project Natal, both of which ditch abstraction. Games which use abstraction allow us to do things which are impossible or very hard in real life, like beat Andy Murray in a tennis match without being a pro tennis player. Once you start replicating people's actions exactly, that goes away again. You become a mere mortal, flawed and inept (Because you're NOT a pro tennis player or whatever). This leads to frustration.

The principle applies to 3D in that once you have content which looks real enough to touch, even tiny imperfections in the signal or image quality will ruin the effect. You ever seen a digital signal breaking up? Imagine that happening to a stereoscopic image of an F1 race. It would be torture. And that's after you've contended with artifacting - sure, the BBC's F1 feed is unlikely to have that problem because the Beeb has tonnes of bandwidth, but other channels will likely have loads of horrible artifacts ruining the sense of reality.

Aside from that, if you can think of a single good reason to show a football match in 3D on a television, I'd like to hear it. I'd also be amazed if people were actually willing to wear polarising glasses on a regular basis - yes, I know not all 3D TVs require them, but cinema-quality 3D is as yet impossible without them.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 8

See our F1 related articles too!