Greener is the modern fad that all forms of $$ business $$ use to help make themselves more $$!
chuck Greener in the advertisement or slogan and youre doing something good for the environment. Like i said reducing Co2 is only prolonging the problem.
Except that we were discussing reducing fuel consumption by 30% in F1, which would make a major change. As well as refocussing F1 engine development on fuel efficient, rather than maximum power, technology. This is a sizeable change for F1. It's more than just a slogan. But as I pointed out in my first reply on this topic, they can go further, with me pointing out vegetable oil powered engines as one potential alternative. So the original change would make F1 greener, in a quantifiable manner, not just as a slogan.
And if there's to be any solution to the current environment, reducing C02 is going to be central to it. And given the size and complexity of world society, there is never, ever, going to be one single big change where everyone stops polluting at once. So making a large number of changes, each of which makes one activity, one organisation, one something greener, with later changes improving the situation even more, is the only hope there is for sufficient change to avoid disaster. Criticising an organisation for making one such change is simply stupidly counter-productive. And shows that you can't see the bigger picture.
and trust me, dont flatter yourself i did not know you were a lesbian, all i knew is you were female. But fact is i dont care if youre lesbian, bi or butch! you guys still get it on right? im pretty sure from my knowledge of lesbian *censored* you do 
but anyway you still need to loosen up abit dont be so monotone, 
its boring! 
So you, who spends much of his time on this forum name-calling, tells me I need to loosen up. Oh, the irony! Looking at what you write on this forum and in PMs, the pattern is clear. As soon as anyone disagrees with you, particularly if they are in the right and have proper arguments that you couldn't hope to deal with, you start name calling. And you criticise others' posting styles?
And, to put it bluntly, I don't believe that you don't know. You were active in the same thread at the same time.
as for the Pming, thats what the function is there for, i wanted clarification on why you made an insulting comment about me and did so not wanting to pollute the forum with trivial banter. I do enough of that with AKR 
The comment was that you'd posted, as I put it, the "non-sequitur of the year". After I politely pointed out to you why it was a non-sequitur, you immediately started on the obscenity and name-calling. Though, this seems to be a pattern with you. And, you don't seem to be able to see the difference between people disagreeing with you, and pointing out the flaws in what you post, and insults. They are very different.
and as far as i can tell you do not need permission to send another member a PM so again get off your high horse missy and if you dont like it, then leave the forum 
It's not sending the PM that I felt was unusual. It's sending obscene PMs, making comments on peoples s e x lives, and calling people such as a "pile of poo" that I found rather childish of you. I haven't taken issue with any other PMs that I have been sent on this forum. I wonder why.
