About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
s***.
Guess this is the end for Rubens?
Edit: Of course, that's a selfish view. This could be the first of many teams to withdraw and would spell the end for Formula 1. If Honda, one of the most profitable car manufacturers, are pulling out because the money they are investing is not translating in to success, then what about teams like Toyota, Williams and even Red Bull?
s***.
Guess this is the end for Rubens?
Edit: Of course, that's a selfish view. This could be the first of many teams to withdraw and would spell the end for Formula 1. If Honda, one of the most profitable car manufacturers, are pulling out because the money they are investing is not translating in to success, then what about teams like Toyota, Williams and even Red Bull?
Toyota, BMW and Renault are definately in danger of going if Honda have gone. Maybe Mercedes too.
This is very shocking news, i can't get over it really, there's potentially only going to be 18 cars on the grid in Australia FFS!!!
Best case scenario would be if Prodrive bought them now...
This is where a 'class' system becomes a smart move. In a similar style to Le Mans, Formula One could be broken up in to classes. It might not be to peoples' liking, but it is surely a better option for both sides (teams and fans) than a standardised series.
Class A
This would be the top class in the sport and would probably consist of cars built to current specifications. This would, of course, only be a viable option for the bigger, more successful teams. I'd expect BMW Sauber, Ferrari, McLaren-Mercedes and Renault to fill this category.
Class B
Running cheaper, less sophisticated cars, this would fit teams with lower budgets and less resources than the four listed above. Williams, Red Bull and Toyota are probably teams I think would fit in here, although the whole grid could probably do so. Engines could be smaller V6s with a much greater level of reliability. Four-race engines and six-race gearboxes would definitely help costs. Other measures such as standardised brake-discs, wheels and off-the-shelf KERS systems being made available would further aid lower-budget teams.
Class C
Class C would be the opportunity for new teams to enter the sport and begin building themselves up to the point where they can move up to one of the higher classes, before the sport returns to the kind of thing we have at the moment once the financial situation settles down. A lot more standardised parts, produced at low-cost, would be available here. Chassis, engine, gearbox, KERS etc. could all be available to buy from a couple of different manufacturers (in the same way that some championships feature a couple of chassis manufacturers, such as Lola and Dallara, and others use a single chassis with multiple engine manufacturers, such as VW and Mercedes). So, basically, a team could enter the sport and build up a car from parts readily available whilst they develop. Of course, as their technical experience expands and their resources grow, they'll want to start building their own cars (or at least, parts of them) and compete with the bigger teams for greater prizes and when (hopefully) the sport returns to its former glory, we'll have larger grids with a good amount of established teams.
Each class would be a separate championship, of course, but all the cars would race on the same track at the same time.
It's not a perfect solution, but surely if someone could enter Class C on, say, a GP2 budget or Class B on something between a GP2 budget and the lower F1 budgets, then that would not only provide some kind of stability for the sport but also incentive for people to join. At least, one would hope so.
See our F1 related articles too!