- 28 Oct 08, 09:56#76553
So Ferrari are threatening to pull out of F1 if the FIA enforces a standard engine in F1. And quite right too.
It's not that I want to see Ferrari out of F1, as tempting as that may be. It's that this goes to the core of the very soul of F1. Since John Cooper decided to put a cheapo engine in the back of a little Cooper chassis, F1 has been about two types of team:
1. Les Garagistes, plucky little British teams for whom chassis is all and engines are stock components you buy in like tyres
2. Ferrari, who see a chassis as simply something to stick an engine in to allow it to move.
This is perhaps an oversimplification but essentially this is the Oxford Cambridge boat race, the Yankees Vs Red Sox, the England Vs Germany at Wembley of F1. The last time an F1 World Title was NOT won by either a British "Garagiste" or Ferrari was 1962, when BRM won (BRM were not garagistes - in my book anyway - and a "Renault" chassis is still a British-built Toleman with a name change)
Where the FIA is right (I am writing a lot of strange sentences today...) is that teams should be able to lower the cost of their engines. The closest thing F1 has had to a standard engine is first the Coventry Climax units of the early sixties and then the Cosworth engines from 1967 onward. In my view, what the FIA needs to do is phrase the engine regulations so that a company such as Cosworth can mass-produce competitive engines at a competitive price, and allow the garagistes to flood back onto the back of the grid. If Ferrari, Mercedes, Toyota, Etc, want to build their own engines, let them. But regulate them in such a way that they don't have too much of a competitive advantage from their additional finances.
Simple.
It's not that I want to see Ferrari out of F1, as tempting as that may be. It's that this goes to the core of the very soul of F1. Since John Cooper decided to put a cheapo engine in the back of a little Cooper chassis, F1 has been about two types of team:
1. Les Garagistes, plucky little British teams for whom chassis is all and engines are stock components you buy in like tyres
2. Ferrari, who see a chassis as simply something to stick an engine in to allow it to move.
This is perhaps an oversimplification but essentially this is the Oxford Cambridge boat race, the Yankees Vs Red Sox, the England Vs Germany at Wembley of F1. The last time an F1 World Title was NOT won by either a British "Garagiste" or Ferrari was 1962, when BRM won (BRM were not garagistes - in my book anyway - and a "Renault" chassis is still a British-built Toleman with a name change)
Where the FIA is right (I am writing a lot of strange sentences today...) is that teams should be able to lower the cost of their engines. The closest thing F1 has had to a standard engine is first the Coventry Climax units of the early sixties and then the Cosworth engines from 1967 onward. In my view, what the FIA needs to do is phrase the engine regulations so that a company such as Cosworth can mass-produce competitive engines at a competitive price, and allow the garagistes to flood back onto the back of the grid. If Ferrari, Mercedes, Toyota, Etc, want to build their own engines, let them. But regulate them in such a way that they don't have too much of a competitive advantage from their additional finances.
Simple.
Jim Clark, Monza, one lap down...