FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[nikon133]

And when you drive your truck everyday are you having to listen to incoming messages from your team radio, watch out for competitors who may leapfrog you in the pits and make a miriard of adjustments to the controls on your steerring wheel. I think not.
His pitlane mistake may well have been a rookie mistake-he was a rookie but can you imagine the outcry by people like you if he had defied his team and said "Im coming in now my tyres are shot". Perhaps his bigger mistake there was in not defying his team.
He has shown plenty of brilliance, Im afraid you are blinded by your dislike

Racechick, he is the biggest bully on the race track at present, and yes that makes him dangerous. He is also least respectful regarding others, which makes sense as such flaws do come together. Simple fact that other drivers are more often complaining about Lewis than anyone else on the track is the best proof you can ask for, only if you care to open your eyes. It is easy to brush'em aside for being jealous, but I can't recall other drivers were such jealous when Alonso was king of the hill, or Mika... even MS.

[Gaz]

And when you drive your truck everyday are you having to listen to incoming messages from your team radio, watch out for competitors who may leapfrog you in the pits and make a miriard of adjustments to the controls on your steerring wheel. I think not.
His pitlane mistake may well have been a rookie mistake-he was a rookie but can you imagine the outcry by people like you if he had defied his team and said "Im coming in now my tyres are shot". Perhaps his bigger mistake there was in not defying his team.
He has shown plenty of brilliance, Im afraid you are blinded by your dislike

Racechick, he is the biggest bully on the race track at present, and yes that makes him dangerous. He is also least respectful regarding others, which makes sense as such flaws do come together. Simple fact that other drivers are more often complaining about Lewis than anyone else on the track is the best proof you can ask for, only if you care to open your eyes. It is easy to brush'em aside for being jealous, but I can't recall other drivers were such jealous when Alonso was king of the hill, or Mika... even MS.

in Monza LH's overtakes were aggressive yes but none of them ended up with the person he tried to over take pointing the wrong way.

Massa rammed two diffrent drivers in the same race and got given a point is that what the FIA wants to show?

[bud]

And when you drive your truck everyday are you having to listen to incoming messages from your team radio, watch out for competitors who may leapfrog you in the pits and make a miriard of adjustments to the controls on your steerring wheel. I think not.
His pitlane mistake may well have been a rookie mistake-he was a rookie but can you imagine the outcry by people like you if he had defied his team and said "Im coming in now my tyres are shot". Perhaps his bigger mistake there was in not defying his team.
He has shown plenty of brilliance, Im afraid you are blinded by your dislike

Racechick, he is the biggest bully on the race track at present, and yes that makes him dangerous. He is also least respectful regarding others, which makes sense as such flaws do come together. Simple fact that other drivers are more often complaining about Lewis than anyone else on the track is the best proof you can ask for, only if you care to open your eyes. It is easy to brush'em aside for being jealous, but I can't recall other drivers were such jealous when Alonso was king of the hill, or Mika... even MS.

in Monza LH's overtakes were aggressive yes but none of them ended up with the person he tried to over take pointing the wrong way.

Massa rammed two diffrent drivers in the same race and got given a point is that what the FIA wants to show?

testify brother longbow speak out against the FIAt devil now

[McLaren Fan]

And when you drive your truck everyday are you having to listen to incoming messages from your team radio, watch out for competitors who may leapfrog you in the pits and make a miriard of adjustments to the controls on your steerring wheel. I think not.
His pitlane mistake may well have been a rookie mistake-he was a rookie but can you imagine the outcry by people like you if he had defied his team and said "Im coming in now my tyres are shot". Perhaps his bigger mistake there was in not defying his team.
He has shown plenty of brilliance, Im afraid you are blinded by your dislike

Racechick, he is the biggest bully on the race track at present, and yes that makes him dangerous. He is also least respectful regarding others, which makes sense as such flaws do come together. Simple fact that other drivers are more often complaining about Lewis than anyone else on the track is the best proof you can ask for, only if you care to open your eyes. It is easy to brush'em aside for being jealous, but I can't recall other drivers were such jealous when Alonso was king of the hill, or Mika... even MS.

in Monza LH's overtakes were aggressive yes but none of them ended up with the person he tried to over take pointing the wrong way.

Massa rammed two diffrent drivers in the same race and got given a point is that what the FIA wants to show?

I'm afraid I can't agree with you on this one, Nikon. Hamilton can be too cocky for his own good, but he is certainly not dangerous and the other drivers certainly are complete hypocrites. I may have said it earlier in this thread, but Alonso criticised Hamilton for his "incident" with Raikkonen in Belgium, despite the fact that he himself did far worse in the 2005 Japanese Grand Prix and in Singapore a fortnight ago. Further, Schumacher got a lot of flak for his driving tactics.

[AKR]

Aren't you being just alittle over sensitive and dare I say irrational?

You never stick up for me, even when I have some degree of reason, that is why I got a little annoyed. Anyway never mind as all is forgiven.

Why should I stickup for you when I dont believe in your outlook? I'm sorry that you feel that way but hey it's just racing right?

Because the fact remains that McLaren Fan claims Ferrari shouldn't have the title as the greatest and most successful team due to the fact that Ferrari were not the most innovative team in F1 history. Although I acknowlege McLaren Fan's quote as Ferrari not being the most innovative as true, I also place the fact that Ferrari has been given this status as they are the team who have won the most races. That is a fact and what is also a fact is that racing success is measured by winnings not who is the most innovative. At the end of the day you can be the most innovative but if you cannot turn that into successful wins on the track then it is worth nothing. I am clearly right here but you simlpy write me off (as always) and give him reason and personally that makes me sick.

[bud]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

[Denthúl]

And when you drive your truck everyday are you having to listen to incoming messages from your team radio, watch out for competitors who may leapfrog you in the pits and make a miriard of adjustments to the controls on your steerring wheel. I think not.
His pitlane mistake may well have been a rookie mistake-he was a rookie but can you imagine the outcry by people like you if he had defied his team and said "Im coming in now my tyres are shot". Perhaps his bigger mistake there was in not defying his team.
He has shown plenty of brilliance, Im afraid you are blinded by your dislike

Racechick, he is the biggest bully on the race track at present, and yes that makes him dangerous. He is also least respectful regarding others, which makes sense as such flaws do come together. Simple fact that other drivers are more often complaining about Lewis than anyone else on the track is the best proof you can ask for, only if you care to open your eyes. It is easy to brush'em aside for being jealous, but I can't recall other drivers were such jealous when Alonso was king of the hill, or Mika... even MS.

in Monza LH's overtakes were aggressive yes but none of them ended up with the person he tried to over take pointing the wrong way.

Massa rammed two diffrent drivers in the same race and got given a point is that what the FIA wants to show?

I'm afraid I can't agree with you on this one, Nikon. Hamilton can be too cocky for his own good, but he is certainly not dangerous and the other drivers certainly are complete hypocrites. I may have said it earlier in this thread, but Alonso criticised Hamilton for his "incident" with Raikkonen in Belgium, despite the fact that he himself did far worse in the 2005 Japanese Grand Prix and in Singapore a fortnight ago. Further, Schumacher got a lot of flak for his driving tactics.

Hamilton also falls in to the hypocrite category. I distinctly remember him whining about being pushed wide by Alonso at Spa last year, but this year I can clearly remember four occasions where he did the same thing. Every driver is a hypocrite, just as every driver is spoiled - some just take it further than others.

[AKR]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Why deviate from my point. Now you want to say we are cheats. If you want to talk about cheating then we can start some new crap that we have all talked about many times and are all sick off. At the end of the day the most innovative team isn't the greatest and most successful. That honour belongs to the one with the most track wins and successess. If you check the stats that is Ferrari. Simple.

[McLaren Fan]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

[bud]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Why deviate from my point. Now you want to say we are cheats. If you want to talk about cheating then we can start some new crap that we have all talked about many times and are all sick off. At the end of the day the most innovative team isn't the greatest and most successful. That honour belongs to the one with the most track wins and successess. If you check the stats that is Ferrari. Simple.

again define winning when Ferrari needs help to win............ id cry if i needed devine help to win in karting, i think id pick a new sport......

[AKR]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

As was Senna's title in 1990 when he deleibratly and admitted taking out Prost. And I don't care what happened the year before. 2 wrongs don't make a right. And in 1999 had Michael Schumacher not broken his leg, McLaren's Mika Hakkinen wouldn't of even won the drivers title so consider yourselves very lucky then. You know this is true as Eddie Irvine was crap and almost won the title. And I am sorry if he is your country man but he was crap. Salo should of won in Germany for Ferrari but had to swap positions with Irvine to help him and the same was the case in Malaysia when Schumacher did the swap as well.
And Irvine's win in Australia that same year was luck as well.

[bud]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

As was Senna's title in 1990 when he deleibratly and admitted taking out Prost. And I don't care what happened the year before. 2 wrongs don't make a right. And in 1999 had Michael Schumacher not broken his leg, McLaren's Mika Hakkinen wouldn't of even won the drivers title so consider yourselves very lucky then. You know this is true as Eddie Irvine was crap and almost won the title. And I am sorry if he is your country man but he was crap. Salo should of won in Germany for Ferrari but had to swap positions with Irvine to help him and the same was the case in Malaysia when Schumacher did the swap as well.
And Irvine's win in Australia that same year was luck as well.

False champions..... i like that sums Ferrari up nice

[McLaren Fan]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

As was Senna's title in 1990 when he deleibratly and admitted taking out Prost. And I don't care what happened the year before. 2 wrongs don't make a right.

Never mind the year before. Balestre telephoned the track and ordered them not to change the sides of the pole and second position to favour Prost and Ferrari. Senna gave you lot just what you deserved.

[McLaren Fan]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

As was Senna's title in 1990 when he deleibratly and admitted taking out Prost. And I don't care what happened the year before. 2 wrongs don't make a right. And in 1999 had Michael Schumacher not broken his leg, McLaren's Mika Hakkinen wouldn't of even won the drivers title so consider yourselves very lucky then. You know this is true as Eddie Irvine was crap and almost won the title. And I am sorry if he is your country man but he was crap. Salo should of won in Germany for Ferrari but had to swap positions with Irvine to help him and the same was the case in Malaysia when Schumacher did the swap as well.
And Irvine's win in Australia that same year was luck as well.

False champions..... i like that sums Ferrari up nice

That's what Senna called Prost after the 1989 season, so credit to the great man.

[AKR]

AKR the only fact is Ferrari have a different definition of the term winning! and they are not winners!

Ferrari are false champions. They were false champions in 1999, false champions last season and are heading to be false champions once again this season with the help of their friends, the FIA.

As was Senna's title in 1990 when he deleibratly and admitted taking out Prost. And I don't care what happened the year before. 2 wrongs don't make a right.

Never mind the year before. Balestre telephoned the track and ordered them not to change the sides of the pole and second position to favour Prost and Ferrari. Senna gave you lot just what you deserved.

Exactly he did what he did now after all those years McLaren and Ron Dennis are paying for all the crimes committed to Ferrari. So McLaren deserve all the bad they get.