FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By bud
#63078
Irv the Swerve wrote:It was Hamilton decision to go on the outside, Kimi had the corner and it was just a little desperate from Lewis.

I know he let him pass but the momentum he got from the corner cutting is how in the end he managed to take the lead. :knob::lurker::nono:
momentum???? he took his foot of the accelerator how can he have ANY momentum!?!?! simple physics FFS :rofl:
#63080
bud wrote:
Irv the Swerve wrote:It was Hamilton decision to go on the outside, Kimi had the corner and it was just a little desperate from Lewis.

I know he let him pass but the momentum he got from the corner cutting is how in the end he managed to take the lead. :knob::lurker::nono:
momentum???? he took his foot of the accelerator how can he have ANY momentum!?!?! simple physics FFS :rofl:
Well if there wasn't a move in the first place, Kimi would have had say a .400 of a lead at the start/finish. So there would be no way that Lewis could grab a tow down the straight if he didnt bounce across the Chicane.
User avatar
By bud
#63081
0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
User avatar
By texasmr2
#63082
Everything was done properly according to the rule's, how can you govern momentum?
User avatar
By bud
#63083
texasmr2 wrote:Everything was done properly according to the rule's, how can you govern momentum?
Youve raced before havent you Tex you understand :thumbup:
User avatar
By Denthúl
#63084
I don't think that Lewis would have made it out of the corner ahead of Kimi, but he wouldn't have been four tenths behind. I think that it would be beyond bad if they applied the time-penalty as, if it was the twenty five second one, that would put him back behind Heidfeld and would put Massa within four points.
User avatar
By scotty
#63086
Put it this way, if Hamilton had actually gone round the corner there rather than cutting across it, there would have been a bigger gap to Raikkonen. So does that mean he gained an advantage cutting across the Bus Stop? Yes, it does. However, i think any penalty would be unfair really, but i can see why they are looking into it. This is just another example of rule 'interpretation' having a big effect on the decision making by the stewards.
#63087
bud wrote:0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
I said roughly you muppet, but he wouldnt be close enough to mount a challenge at La Source.
User avatar
By bud
#63088
Irv the Swerve wrote:
bud wrote:0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
I said roughly you muppet, but he wouldnt be close enough to mount a challenge at La Source.
if he didnt take the off road they both would have retired, so your last comment is right paddy :thumbup:
User avatar
By bud
#63089
Ron Dennis
"We immediately radioed him to let Kimi back past and he immediately let Kimi past. We then checked with Charlie Whiting and, although Charlie is not a steward, the opinion he gave was that he had complied with the rules."
#63090
bud wrote:Ron Dennis
"We immediately radioed him to let Kimi back past and he immediately let Kimi past. We then checked with Charlie Whiting and, although Charlie is not a steward, the opinion he gave was that he had complied with the rules."
Oh and who was that from....Ron Dennis. :yikes:

Yeah he must be right...
User avatar
By Denthúl
#63091
bud wrote:Ron Dennis
"We immediately radioed him to let Kimi back past and he immediately let Kimi past. We then checked with Charlie Whiting and, although Charlie is not a steward, the opinion he gave was that he had complied with the rules."
Unfortunately, Charlie isn't a steward and, as such, has no influence over the decision. :/
#63092
bud wrote:
Irv the Swerve wrote:
bud wrote:0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
I said roughly you muppet, but he wouldnt be close enough to mount a challenge at La Source.
if he didnt take the off road they both would have retired, so your last comment is right paddy :thumbup:
He we go with the racism bud which clearly i have made a valid point but its just because its Pretty Boy Lewis himself you have to go very defensive. :nono:
User avatar
By scotty
#63093
bud wrote:
Irv the Swerve wrote:
bud wrote:0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
I said roughly you muppet, but he wouldnt be close enough to mount a challenge at La Source.
if he didnt take the off road they both would have retired, so your last comment is right paddy :thumbup:
Yeah, or Hamilton could've backed out and still made it round the corner... Raikkonen was in front so was entitled to take the racing line. :confused: That said, i wouldn't have expected anyone not to do what Hamilton did.
#63094
scotty wrote:
bud wrote:
Irv the Swerve wrote:
bud wrote:0.4??

Ok you want to play the if games IF Kimi didnt force Lewis off lewis would have had 0.4 coming out of the corner :thumbup:

sour grapes dude :nono:
I said roughly you muppet, but he wouldnt be close enough to mount a challenge at La Source.
if he didnt take the off road they both would have retired, so your last comment is right paddy :thumbup:
That said, i wouldn't have expected anyone not to do what Hamilton did.
But still wouldn't make it right.
  • 1
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 14

Kimi has done it! The youngest ever F1 champion. A[…]

Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!