- 22 Aug 08, 22:09#61378
Umm no not really. If you've been around, you would know I'm a huge fan of track and field and I know quite a bit. I say they both are equally the star of the games since Jamaica's 4x100 smashed the world record. To say one is greater than then the other is just ignorant because you'll never know the answer.
Thing is, everyone had the deep water. Him being better in deep water counts for nothing in your argument. Otherwise, you could say that Bolt was helped by the fact that he was only running 100 and 200 metre races, rather than 400 metre races.
Did Mark Spitz have the deep water in Munich? Did Ian Thorpe have the deep water in Sydney? It was the 2008 Beijing Olympics only. Like I said it's not about his competitor's because I wouldn't have brought the deep water and swimsuit up.
Just admit Phelps is the star of the games.
It's easy for you to say that because you're American. So you'll have a bias view whether you believe it or not.
.
Umm no not really. If you've been around, you would know I'm a huge fan of track and field and I know quite a bit. I say they both are equally the star of the games since Jamaica's 4x100 smashed the world record. To say one is greater than then the other is just ignorant because you'll never know the answer.



. But yeah I seen you like your track and field. Plus, when we're not saying who was greater than the other? It was about whose achievements were greater and who the star was of Olympics. On the bias view it's like me saying Steven Redgrave is a greater Olympian than Michael Phelps. The majority of people would assume that I'm being bias. Or even me saying Chris Hoy's achievements are greater than Usain Bolt's.


