About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
IF any team was to be inspected McLaren would be the logical choice because of this big leap forward. Everyone is shocked at the performance gap so suddenly, so naturally it raises questions. All valid because of the engine freeze rule.
why wasnt there an IF to be an inspection after Ferrari won 3 in a row?
It could very well be another case of MM and the FIA having a go at McLaren I dont know but I am also alittle suspicious.
It could very well be another case of MM and the FIA having a go at McLaren I dont know but I am also alittle suspicious.
Thankfully, one of the tifosi sees sense. I actually agree with Mike that if an inspection was to be carried out on an engine, McLaren's would be the one which you check first. But that is not the point. The point is that the this inspection is meant to be completely at random, but conveniently, when McLaren improve a little bit, their car is the first one to be inspected, and, not only that, it's Hamilton's McLaren. I don't believe they will find anything wrong with the engine anyway. Most of McLaren's improvements have come a lot of new aerodynamic pieces and, I suspect, some tweaking with the rear suspension to improve the car's once poor traction.
IF any team was to be inspected McLaren would be the logical choice because of this big leap forward. Everyone is shocked at the performance gap so suddenly, so naturally it raises questions. All valid because of the engine freeze rule.
That make's sense to me also.
why wasnt there an IF to be an inspection after Ferrari won 3 in a row?
Possibly because those three race's were not won by the same driver or in such a dominating fashion? It could very well be another case of MM and the FIA having a go at McLaren I dont know but I am also alittle suspicious.
yes random ultimately means you pull a name out of a hat, what Mike is saying is they should pick the current pace setter.
By picking the current pace setter means youre choosing by selection which is not random at all. that goes against the FIA's comment that this is a random inspection
but conveniently, when McLaren improve a little bit
but conveniently, when McLaren improve a little bit
2 to 3 seconds per lap above everybody else's race pace is not "a little bit"...
... but you're right, it's not random.
We are, however, talking about a team that had all of it's points stripped from it for breaking the law last year... I think the same management was involved at that time.
but conveniently, when McLaren improve a little bit
2 to 3 seconds per lap above everybody else's race pace is not "a little bit"...
... but you're right, it's not random.
We are, however, talking about a team that had all of it's points stripped from it for breaking the law last year... I think the same management was involved at that time.
I was referring to Ron Dennis.
See our F1 related articles too!