I am extremely suspicious of this whole process.
1. The very expensive Barrister, engaged by MM and paid for by FIA (that is wrong in itself, this is a personal issue for MM not an FIA one) presented the case for MM. There was no presentation of the case against MM. Members were not allowed to question MM, even though some wanted to.
The whole thing just stinks.
2. This vote was not so much about MMs 'private activities' as about whether he could continue to do the job effectively. The Barristers points were about whether the accusations against MM are true or not, and about his action against the News of the World, this is all irrelevant to whether he can do the job or not.The straight facts are that he cannot do the job because so many organisations now, either wont deal with him or he has lost their respect.
FIA is not just about F1 and much of the 'support' probably came from other areas. One wonders why people did vote in favour of MM when it is clear that he has brought the FIA and motor sport into disrepute (nothing to do with his case against the N.o.t.W.), and has lost the respect of so many important people in F1 at least. What was in it for them? did they have some incentive? Max has definitely not just won this vote on merit, I am very sure of this, because it does not make sense. If the FIA was a commercial organisation he would have been gone weeks ago.
its a shame that fans could not have a vote - he would definitely be gone if we did.



Strive to be fast, strive to be first but, above all, strive to be alive.
Martin