- 23 Jul 17, 18:28#442958
Have I driven F1 cars? No. Have I sat in them, yes. Have I driven single-seaters, yes. Unless you've x-ray vision the halo is going to make a significant difference to viewability.
Suggest you do some research - plenty of videos show the trajectory quite nicely. It's likely it would have made it inside the halo - hence why I believe an alternative should be sought.
Did I say that though? No. I referred to the fact you could drop a bouncing wheel on the drivers head with or without the halo fitted. Look at the top down view of the system. Again, this is why I believe an alternative system is required.
God, call me worthless too and you'd sound just like my mother.
You don't know what the driver's view is from the cockpit with (or without) the halo because you have never driven an F1 car in your life
Have I driven F1 cars? No. Have I sat in them, yes. Have I driven single-seaters, yes. Unless you've x-ray vision the halo is going to make a significant difference to viewability.
you don't know if the halo would have prevented Massa from getting hurt back in 2009 because you have no way of proving what effect it would have had on the debris that hit him
Suggest you do some research - plenty of videos show the trajectory quite nicely. It's likely it would have made it inside the halo - hence why I believe an alternative should be sought.
and the halo would have saved Henry Surtees from being killed because it would have stopped the wheel from hitting his head, after all that is the point of it.
Did I say that though? No. I referred to the fact you could drop a bouncing wheel on the drivers head with or without the halo fitted. Look at the top down view of the system. Again, this is why I believe an alternative system is required.
So you are right that you don't understand it, in fact you don't have a fecking clue, that much is clear.
God, call me worthless too and you'd sound just like my mother.