About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Andrew Benson wrote:">Lewis Hamilton should change stance on 'halo' - John Surtees
..."I suffered the tragedy of losing Henry which certainly could've been prevented by a development like this," he said.
Ferrari's Sebastian Vettel had said the device can be as "ugly as possible" as long as it helps save lives. The German also thinks Henry Surtees would "still be around if we had this type of system"...
"Sebastian hit the nail very clearly on the head with what he said. Henry was hit by a wheel that weighed 28kg so there would have been a chance there [had a 'halo' been installed]."
McLaren's Fernando Alonso, meanwhile, says the 'halo' device is a "necessary" step.
"It will be the future of F1, because we cannot afford any serious injury or fatal accident as we had in the last two years," said the two-time world champion, referring to the fatal injuries sustained by Jules Bianchi and Justin Wilson...
Apparently, Charlie Whiting said today that the Halo will be mandatory from 2017 on. It'll be a standard halo, i.e., the same for all teams and the FIA won't budge even if another, better design of driver protection shows up in the meantime - the Halo it is for now.
Ironically, the race series that triggered this all with Justin Wilson's death during an Indy Car race doesn't even talk to the FIA about implementing the Halo.
The problem with the halo as seen on the Ferrari is that it's not a full protection structure, there is potential for debris or a piece of equipment to come from the left or right of center and still hit the driver. If we are to proceed with the cockpit protection systems, we need to have an aircraft style canopy which would deflect an impact absolutely.
See our F1 related articles too!