Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
I give up Overboost, I guess I'll just have to live with the fact that the slower guy won in the inaugural Sochi Grand Prix only because the faster guy made a "bonehead" mistake according to your description. I hope I can come to grips with that until Austin and see if the slower guy makes it five in a row.
...Put aside your bias and stop pretending to be onjective - there is nothing wrong with bias, just dont try and pretend you are coming from an intellectual pov instead of an emotional one...
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!I give up Overboost, I guess I'll just have to live with the fact that the slower guy won in the inaugural Sochi Grand Prix only because the faster guy made a "bonehead" mistake according to your description. I hope I can come to grips with that until Austin and see if the slower guy makes it five in a row.
To bad cookin but you already gave up that argument with your clever analysis of the timing data. According to you Rosberg had to stop pushing in the corners to keep the deg under control. So basically he maxed out his tires but still got 30 extra laps and managed to set a time 3 tenths quicker than Hamilton. Amazing drive I would say proven by your most intelligent analysis.
Oh and he did all this while moving from virtually last to second place passing 18 cars while his teammate had the open road.
That's what I would call a winning setup if not for his bonehead mistake giving the lead back to Hamilton.
all very fancy and dandy and clever as you are, how comes you are unable to answer a simple question????
You told us earlier in the season that Lewis was mentally weak and had met his nemesis in Nicos superior mindset
Is this still the case, yes or no? no blahdeblah required, simple yes or no? were you wrong or is it more complicated than that blah blahdeblah etc
I didn't say that middle line but that almost goes without saying now.
And as for the yes or no, it's the wrong question, extended from the wrong sound bites you've got ringing in your ears. You lead yourself down the wrong path. That's why I can't answer it.
It feels now that the extra speed Hamilton has is no longer an advantage because he finds a way of negating it. I'm starting to feel we've seen this before in Hamilton, this psychological weakness we pretend is misfortune.
It held true at the time. We discussed it at length. Do you want me to drag out all the finer points on my position, instead of this sound bite?
This is exactly the point i'm making, you have that sentence in your head, and that's it. It was the starting point of a discussion not an end point.
Now find where I said Nico was stronger mentally.
It held true at the time. We discussed it at length. Do you want me to drag out all the finer points on my position, instead of this sound bite?
This is exactly the point i'm making, you have that sentence in your head, and that's it. It was the starting point of a discussion not an end point.
Now find where I said Nico was stronger mentally.
If it held at the time it must still hold 'the mental weakness we have seen before' - its just hidden now, if he had bad luck in a race it would be the same mental weakness roth?
so the mental weakness that held true because he made a couple of mistakes in quali, that disguises itself as misfortune - can come back at some point - yes or no?
I never understand why people say things then are surprised when held accountable to what they said. There seems to always be a reason for what they're saying now superseding what they said then.
1) lying
2) changing ones mind
3) ulterior motive (trolling)
4) lack of intelligence
5) amnesia
6) hypocrisy
Can anyone help me out here, I'm trying to make sense of something that to me seems illogical so it's difficult to grasp.
I never understand why people say things then are surprised when held accountable to what they said. There seems to always be a reason for what they're saying now superseding what they said then.
1) lying
2) changing ones mind
3) ulterior motive (trolling)
4) lack of intelligence
5) amnesia
6) hypocrisy
Can anyone help me out here, I'm trying to make sense of something that to me seems illogical so it's difficult to grasp.
Just had another thought on this... Being wrong was left off the list because it never occurs to said people that it could be a possibility. We'd have 3/4 less content here otherwise.
I never understand why people say things then are surprised when held accountable to what they said. There seems to always be a reason for what they're saying now superseding what they said then.
1) lying
2) changing ones mind
3) ulterior motive (trolling)
4) lack of intelligence
5) amnesia
6) hypocrisy
Can anyone help me out here, I'm trying to make sense of something that to me seems illogical so it's difficult to grasp.
Just had another thought on this... Being wrong was left off the list because it never occurs to said people that it could be a possibility. We'd have 3/4 less content here otherwise.
Doesnt changing your mind come under same heading as being wrong? You change your mind because you know you were wrong?
That's actually a wholesome one and you could see it that way but... You could have come to a decision based on ignorance or not having all the facts or being misled. Changing your mind shows a willingness to learn the truth is more important than being right or proving a point.Changing your mind shows a willingness to learn the truth is more important than being right or proving a point.
See our F1 related articles too!
