- 14 Oct 14, 13:42#421372
Maybe even one of those mea culpas would be too much for you.
I simply and correctly pointed out that engines were not frozen from ALL development for either all or the best part of the last decade. I also pointed out that in the first year of the last new engine, teams were freely allowed to make engine changes.
Fancy trying one of those mea culpas now?
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari
... the engines were similarily frozen of ALL dvelopment not just in season for the best part of the previous decade.
The last engine change started in 2006 and was essentially the V8's used until last year. The first year of that engines use there was free and unfettered engine changes allowed throughout the whole season.
In the years that followed, the FiA allowed what they called engine "re-equalisations".
The engines were certainly not "frozen from ALL development" for the last decade
when did the best part (more than half) of a decade become 'for the last' decade
and did you forget to read the part I described the mechanism of equalisation for the current era therefore setting the context for anyone with a brain that a similar process must have occured in the previous era if they were frozen for the best part of the decade?
reequalisation is frozen after equalisation with only relaiblity updates - its was Renault so far behind that caused the reequalisation to drag on
I think the mea culpas are on you - why do you even bother
Maybe even one of those mea culpas would be too much for you.
I simply and correctly pointed out that engines were not frozen from ALL development for either all or the best part of the last decade. I also pointed out that in the first year of the last new engine, teams were freely allowed to make engine changes.
Fancy trying one of those mea culpas now?

"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari