F2004 wrote:CookinFlat6 wrote:The only hope is that Alonso does go to Red Bull. Chances are he would get more out of the season than Ricc who is not as experienced. ferrari have a lot more work to do than MM originally thought. Its not just speed its a whole fundamental change needed to get them regularly at the front
Gotta be RBR at least for 2015, no one else will be getting remotely near the Merc 2015 Hybrid IMO
Yet another einstein pile of BS.
is that the limit to your intellectual output???
why dont you tell us why its Bs, have some confidence in your opinion, expand a little, push the boat out, dont just head for the ad hominem (means to discredit your intellectual opponent instead of his argument - a long established cop out for the intellectually deficient would be master debater) exit without staking your claim
Come on have a go, give us the chance to intellectually rough you up a little, let me help
Chances are he would get more out of the season than Ricc who is not as experienced - bs? why - produce an argument
Ferrari have a lot more work to do than MM originally thought. - bs? why - produce an argument
Its not just speed its a whole fundamental change needed to get them regularly at the front - bs? why - produce an argument
Gotta be RBR at least for 2015, no one else will be getting remotely near the Merc 2015 Hybrid IMO - note the IMO, but you are welcome to produce a contra opinion to render mine BS - hint - supply a premise then provide some basis for the premise - so its bs that no one will get remotely near the 2015 Merc - whats your premise, mine is the precedent of 2014
But if you prefer to stick to the one line hit and run banditry you will be truly advancing the credibility and reputation of the current Ferrari members here
There are a few F1 fans on here who have integrity and self respect and have the brain power to find this gem on Wiki by typing 'forum debate'
Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument. Debate is a broader form of argument than deductive reasoning, which only examines whether a conclusion is a consequence of premises, and factual argument, which only examines what is or isn't the case, or rhetoric, which is a technique of persuasion. Though logical consistency, factual accuracy and some degree of emotional appeal to the audience are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating, one side often prevails over the other side by presenting a superior "context" and/or framework of the issue, which is far more subtle and strategic. The outcome of a debate depends upon consensus or some formal way of reaching a resolution, rather than the objective facts as such. In a formal debating contest, there are rules for participants to discuss and decide on differences, within a framework defining how they will interact.
but I suspect we will hear jack squat from dorothy once the seat belts have been tightened
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
- By hass25