This thread is laughable.
Mercedes has a business agenda in the sport. They're not coming in and investing millions to do a charity. If they want their actions in the sport to stay relevant to their core business (selling road cars), what's the harm in that?
BMW and Toyota left when they felt the sport isn't giving them the necessary ROI. What's the wrong in this? Everyone's got an agenda, let's not pretend they don't.
If Mercedes' terms weren't accepted and they say "very well, farewell", well then what's the argument here?
If Mercedes put forward the terms, and then the terms are agreed with and they stayed on and then made sh!t engines and a sh!t car....and then demanded the terms be changed, well then I call perennial losers.If Ferrari for example found the V6 turbos to be a joke, and not relevant to their core business (whatever it is, I don't care) and left the sport...well good for them! I call that smart since they know what they want and stood by it.
When terms are agreed with and all teams work towards changes, and then when a couple of losers find out they aren't good enough and whine -
THEN, we have some sore loser, whinging pompoms who have no frigging clue what they want or what they stand for.
I think this is crystal clear. Btw, I put forward my points with no names, and hypothetical situations and I hope it complies with forum regulations.
