- 06 Apr 08, 22:11#38944
Pat Symmonds has said he didn't brake-test Hamilton, has shown the telemetry to Autosport and they seem convinced. I really don't see Pat Symmonds being the kind of person to tell porkies about this sort of thing.
I think it was one of those bits of TV footage that for no particular reason is just plain misleading. Both Brundle and Blundell, drivers with 219 GPs between them, both thought it was a brake test, and they don't just invent these things, they must have had some justification. It's very rare to see a car simply drive into the back of another one so readily, so to conclude that it was probably a brake test is understandable, if ultimately the facts contradict it.
I was one of those who thought it was a brake test, so I hold my hand up. Case closed.
I have no doubts he (Alonso) brake-tested Hamilton coming out of that particular corner. There is never that difference in acceleration in Formula One cars. Although there's really no point in investigating insofar as Hamilton and Alonso got no points and will not be battling one another for the title, I feel it's important to know what really happened and seeing the 99%-sure guilty Alonso punished.
Pat Symmonds has said he didn't brake-test Hamilton, has shown the telemetry to Autosport and they seem convinced. I really don't see Pat Symmonds being the kind of person to tell porkies about this sort of thing.
I think it was one of those bits of TV footage that for no particular reason is just plain misleading. Both Brundle and Blundell, drivers with 219 GPs between them, both thought it was a brake test, and they don't just invent these things, they must have had some justification. It's very rare to see a car simply drive into the back of another one so readily, so to conclude that it was probably a brake test is understandable, if ultimately the facts contradict it.
I was one of those who thought it was a brake test, so I hold my hand up. Case closed.
Jim Clark, Monza, one lap down...