- 11 Nov 13, 17:24#380504
I see why at the time he may have thought that, as a lot of people said it at the time. Glock did lose 18 seconds on the last lap, and considering the previous laps were comparably paced you could see why there was a conspiracy theory, however, the reason Glock lost the time was because the rain got heavier as time went on and he effectively lost all grip on the final lap (he gambled and didnt pit for wets) and if you saw when Lewis passed him, he barely had traction to get up the hill to the line!
Like I say, at the time I could see why there was a conspiracy theory, but 5 years after when the logical reason has been proven? Bit of sour grapes I think!
Is Luca implying that timo glock let hamilton by?
I see why at the time he may have thought that, as a lot of people said it at the time. Glock did lose 18 seconds on the last lap, and considering the previous laps were comparably paced you could see why there was a conspiracy theory, however, the reason Glock lost the time was because the rain got heavier as time went on and he effectively lost all grip on the final lap (he gambled and didnt pit for wets) and if you saw when Lewis passed him, he barely had traction to get up the hill to the line!
Like I say, at the time I could see why there was a conspiracy theory, but 5 years after when the logical reason has been proven? Bit of sour grapes I think!