- 27 May 13, 11:50#360355I find a lot of the defence of Perez yesterday quite odd to be honest. Yes he made some of the moves stick, and yes it did liven the race up a bit - and that I am all for. But strictly speaking, the move itself was, in all circumstances and attempts, a banzai move up the inside, relying on the other car to not turn into the apex that they would have had every right to do. It's an unwritten but often discussed rule amongst ALL professional racing drivers that those types of moves are a no-no, which is why I can completely understand, sympathise and agree with Kimi for his post-race comments. The only way that Alonso could avoid contact was to jump off the track, and had contact occurred it would unquestionably have been Perez' fault - Alonso didn't have to move off track, or off of the racing line, it would have been an avoidable accident by virtue of Perez not slinging one up the inside, because it is not reasonable to HAVE to avoid contact by cutting a chicane.
Ask yourself the question - what if the turn was not just a kerb, but a wall. Perez actions would have forced Alonso to either crash head on with it, or turn in and make contact with the McLaren. Just because it isn't a wall does NOT make the move acceptable.
Perez race ending in the manner it did was always on the cards - he pushed his luck one too many times and with the wrong driver.
Favourite racing series: F1, Indycar, NASCAR, GP2, F3, Formula E, Trophee Andros, DTM, WTCC, BTCC, World Endurance... etc. etc.