Other teams would not do the same, because first of all: the opportunity to have such a big difference on start sides are slim to none. Second, the possibilities of being in such a position where 5 places drop for one driver clearly works in their favour... is also slim to none. 5 places is a big penalty.
Slim to none? it happened, the chances are not none.
Who's to say some team in the future might not see a way to either improve their own position or put someone else at a disadvantage with similar actions? I just don't think the rules should allow a team to have the option of shuffling the grid.
I didnt think it was worth it (as I thought a strong Massa up front would have been better for Fernando), but when I saw Alonso in P4 by turn 1, i realized why they run teams and i post on forums.
I mean the opportunity of such conditions happening AGAIN for other teams to use.
1. New circuit, massive difference in grip. How many times ever before has the bad side lost that many positions in a start? What are the odds of this happening again?
2. Both team drivers on the bad side, lead driver behind but within reach of the penalty (ie Mclaren couldnt have done it with Lewis or Button for example as they were too far apart)
3. A cooperating 2nd driver.... face it, VERY few drivers would have put up with that. And it would have definitely not happened had Massa been P2 or in a position to hassle the competing driver (vettel). Would Ferrari had done if Massa was on the good side?
When you factor the possibility of something like this ocurring again..... I say slim to none.
How about this: think of any scenario, in any other race where something like this would have made sense. Remember, Ferrari did it only because it made sense to them. I'm very bad with trivia and i have been watching F1 for so long its all a big blur... so i dont know anytime when something like this could have happened (regardless of the gearbox rule being new)....
My guess is, the FIA will just let this be.
Came out fighting indeed.