FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328652
What defines a driver as being a Ferrari driver?

I would have thought driving for Ferrari made one a Ferrari driver... :confused:


Apart from that. How is Schumacher not a typical Ferrari driver?


He was a complete machine and won five titles with them. How many other Ferrari drivers did that? ;)

Maybe that's why he was not typical
;)
By Hammer278
#328653
Winning must be the game, cos I never saw Schumacher as a typical Ferrari driver.......but he won. Gilles Villeneuve, Alesi, Ayrton , those to me were Ferrari drivers. ( I'm not even going near the current crop!)



Wait, Ayrton? He was a McLaren driver! I'm talking about the red/white McLaren which were a winning team, not the bunch of clowns we have today riding on a great name.

And for the rest of yous, I think she meant a driver who's passionate about the Ferrari brand and fluent Italian speakers. Schumacher was a German machine, efficient and a bloody good driver but you don't really associate him with Ferrari. This is my stab as to what rc might be saying...but could be completely off hook of course.
By andrew
#328654
What defines a driver as being a Ferrari driver?

I would have thought driving for Ferrari made one a Ferrari driver... :confused:


Apart from that. How is Schumacher not a typical Ferrari driver?


He was a complete machine and won five titles with them. How many other Ferrari drivers did that? ;)

Maybe that's why he was not typical
;)


Never mind Ferrari drivers. How many other drivers have done that with any team? Is what Racechick is saying is that Ferrari drivers are losers but Schumacher wasn't typical as he won with them? :confused:
User avatar
By Denthúl
#328655
What defines a driver as being a Ferrari driver?

I would have thought driving for Ferrari made one a Ferrari driver... :confused:


Apart from that. How is Schumacher not a typical Ferrari driver?


He was a complete machine and won five titles with them. How many other Ferrari drivers did that? ;)

Maybe that's why he was not typical
;)


Never mind Ferrari drivers. How many other drivers have done that with any team? Is what Racechick is saying is that Ferrari drivers are losers but Schumacher wasn't typical as he won with them? :confused:


No, I think she was getting at what Hammer said. I was just pointing out other things. :hehe:
By andrew
#328656
What defines a driver as being a Ferrari driver?

I would have thought driving for Ferrari made one a Ferrari driver... :confused:


Apart from that. How is Schumacher not a typical Ferrari driver?


He was a complete machine and won five titles with them. How many other Ferrari drivers did that? ;)

Maybe that's why he was not typical
;)


Never mind Ferrari drivers. How many other drivers have done that with any team? Is what Racechick is saying is that Ferrari drivers are losers but Schumacher wasn't typical as he won with them? :confused:


No, I think she was getting at what Hammer said. I was just pointing out other things. :hehe:


I thought all drivers a are passionate about Ferrari as it is the team they all want to drive for. And Schumacher is fluent in Italian, I believe.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328657
I'm sure she meant Prost. Unless being a typical Ferrari driver doesnt involve driving for Ferrari

Oh god... Racechick get back in here!! Don't leave us with all these doubts.....
User avatar
By racechick
#328658
No I didn't mean Prost. hammer and Denthul knew what I meant. Heart drivers. For me there are heart drivers and head drivers. Schumacher and Prost were head drivers. that's not to take anything away from head drivers. But the ultimate would be a heart driver in a Ferrari. That's it really. Ferrari, with all their history and passion have the opportunity to create the ultimate, but they need a heart driver. If they'd had Ayrton, Gilles or if Valentino Rossi had driven cars, that would have been it.
User avatar
By racechick
#328660
Ahhhhh ok i get it. Head vs heart...

I'm a boob man myself :D

They can get in the way of the steering wheel and all those buttons on it.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328662
Ahhhhh ok i get it. Head vs heart...

I'm a boob man myself :D

They can get in the way of the steering wheel and all those buttons on it.


But more fun in the bumpy sectors.
By andrew
#328664
Ahhhhh ok i get it. Head vs heart...

I'm a boob man myself :D

They can get in the way of the steering wheel and all those buttons on it.


But more fun in the bumpy sectors.


Image
User avatar
By f1ea
#328665
Schumacher has a fair amount of heart, although yeah, he didn't generally drive like that.


I guess its more a matter of what kind of driver is successful now vs before. Teams will look for the drivers they need to win; and drivers will adjust to what the teams need. Its modern F1, the era with electric engines. Enzo is probably glad he's not here to see that.

Also, Grosjean could be very successful in an era with 6 cars on the grid.......

See our F1 related articles too!