- 07 Oct 12, 17:54#325263
I thought he was going to be equal to Rosberg at Mercedes? Guess Brawn has lost the plot too?
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Just denying it doesn't make it true. It was just one of those things - s*** happens.
I think Alonso himself has performed the correct analysis: http://www.sportinglife.com/formula1/ne ... -raikkonen
If Alonso told me the sky was blue I'd have to either ask for a 2nd opinion or go outside and check.
So what was Raikkonen meant to do? Levitate, vapourise, hope for a passing spaceship to beam him up?
It was a racing incident in field that got bunched.
Braking is not unheard of in F1 y'know.
So by Andrew's reasoning, should Webber have moved over for Grosjean too??
Anyways... it was a very close call and very slight contact, just unfortunate that it burst the tire. But Kimi should have avoided imminent contact considering he was the one eh... behind?
If you could think a bit, this incident might remind you of Grosjean and Schumacher in Monaco. Grosjean moved over till Schumacher made contact with the wall and spun Grosjean out, that was a popular incident which made Grosjean...very unpopular.
Only this time, since there are no walls and it involved Lord Alonso, everyone's like 'ok racing incident' which is understandable since he f*cked over himself so there was not much need to care about.
I thought he was going to be equal to Rosberg at Mercedes? Guess Brawn has lost the plot too?
All this talk of equal drivers is just to sooth fragile egos. Lewis is faster than just about everyone on the grid.
All this talk of equal drivers is just to sooth fragile egos. Lewis is faster than just about everyone on the grid.
Apart from Vettle, and Alonso and sometimes Button?
All this talk of equal drivers is just to sooth fragile egos. Lewis is faster than just about everyone on the grid.
Apart from Vettle, and Alonso and sometimes Button?
Careful Lemon,
All this talk of equal drivers is just to sooth fragile egos. Lewis is faster than just about everyone on the grid.
Apart from Vettle, and Alonso and sometimes Button?
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?
The worst thing about it all...... is that somehow "they" keep trying to find the logic around this. Holy goodness. One must only laugh.
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?
The worst thing about it all...... is that somehow "they" keep trying to find the logic around this. Holy goodness. One must only laugh.
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?
The worst thing about it all...... is that somehow "they" keep trying to find the logic around this. Holy goodness. One must only laugh.
I'm afraid it's how they roll in the south west of Scotland. It's comes from being close to Glasgow.
:D
As long as we all know that Button's number two.
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?
The worst thing about it all...... is that somehow "they" keep trying to find the logic around this. Holy goodness. One must only laugh.
I'm afraid it's how they roll in the south west of Scotland. It's comes from being close to Glasgow.
As long as we all know that Button's number two.
All this talk of equal drivers is just to sooth fragile egos. Lewis is faster than just about everyone on the grid.
Apart from Vettle, and Alonso and sometimes Button?
Careful Lemon,
See our F1 related articles too!