- 07 Oct 12, 17:29#325246
So a driver who is 20 seconds ahead and got a chance of gaining a place should pull over for their team mate who is slower and there will be no gain to the team in terms of points?


Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
What's wrong with saying that Button should be number two at McLaren??
That's the truth.
"You're as slow as a week in jail so move over for Lewis", should be the order for the run in. It won't of course because Button thinks he's "worldclass"....lol.
Number of points JB has scored in the last six races: 85
Number of points that LH has scored in the last six races: 60
Oh but of course JB should be a No. 2. driver, because he's not "worldclass" like LH is.
In this race? Because Jenson was close and faster than Kobayashi and Lewis was way back.
Grosjean..........................................................................................
Grosjean..........................................................................................
He belongs in banger racing.
Erm, do McLaren say they care more about winning races than the championship? It's not relevant in this race . . . they were no where near the lead.
You say he was never going to get past, your just really always negative about Jenson, I think there was a fair chance, and the extra constructors point were the rightful priority.
Just denying it doesn't make it true. It was just one of those things - s*** happens.
I think Alonso himself has performed the correct analysis: http://www.sportinglife.com/formula1/ne ... -raikkonen
If Alonso told me the sky was blue I'd have to either ask for a 2nd opinion or go outside and check.
So what was Raikkonen meant to do? Levitate, vapourise, hope for a passing spaceship to beam him up?
It was a racing incident in field that got bunched.
Erm, do McLaren say they care more about winning races than the championship? It's not relevant in this race . . . they were no where near the lead.
You say he was never going to get past, your just really always negative about Jenson, I think there was a fair chance, and the extra constructors point were the rightful priority.
The likelihood of Button passing someone, he needs the driver ahead to be another robot like him driving around and tyres fading badly. I don't know, it seems like most people know more about Button and his 'capabilities' than McLaren itself. This was Lewis' crappiest weekend driving with a crap setup and he finished like 12 seconds behind. If only he had hooked that sh*t up correctly, Vettel might have had to sweat a bit..but that's Lewis' fault of course, no denying that. This was an expensive (and first) mistake from him this season.
Just denying it doesn't make it true. It was just one of those things - s*** happens.
I think Alonso himself has performed the correct analysis: http://www.sportinglife.com/formula1/ne ... -raikkonen
If Alonso told me the sky was blue I'd have to either ask for a 2nd opinion or go outside and check.
So what was Raikkonen meant to do? Levitate, vapourise, hope for a passing spaceship to beam him up?
It was a racing incident in field that got bunched.
Braking is not unheard of in F1 y'know.
So by Andrew's reasoning, should Webber have moved over for Grosjean too??
Anyways... it was a very close call and very slight contact, just unfortunate that it burst the tire. But Kimi should have avoided imminent contact considering he was the one eh... behind?
Erm, do McLaren say they care more about winning races than the championship? It's not relevant in this race . . . they were no where near the lead.
You say he was never going to get past, your just really always negative about Jenson, I think there was a fair chance, and the extra constructors point were the rightful priority.
The likelihood of Button passing someone, he needs the driver ahead to be another robot like him driving around and tyres fading badly. I don't know, it seems like most people know more about Button and his 'capabilities' than McLaren itself. This was Lewis' crappiest weekend driving with a crap setup and he finished like 12 seconds behind. If only he had hooked that sh*t up correctly, Vettel might have had to sweat a bit..but that's Lewis' fault of course, no denying that. This was an expensive (and first) mistake from him this season.
Button had a gearbox change too remember or he would have been well ahead.
Button's pretty good at passing too.
Erm, do McLaren say they care more about winning races than the championship? It's not relevant in this race . . . they were no where near the lead.
You say he was never going to get past, your just really always negative about Jenson, I think there was a fair chance, and the extra constructors point were the rightful priority.
The likelihood of Button passing someone, he needs the driver ahead to be another robot like him driving around and tyres fading badly. I don't know, it seems like most people know more about Button and his 'capabilities' than McLaren itself. This was Lewis' crappiest weekend driving with a crap setup and he finished like 12 seconds behind. If only he had hooked that sh*t up correctly, Vettel might have had to sweat a bit..but that's Lewis' fault of course, no denying that. This was an expensive (and first) mistake from him this season.
Button had a gearbox change too remember or he would have been well ahead.
Button's pretty good at passing too.
Yeah, I'm talking about race pace. My point is, Lewis screwed himself over during qualifying giving himself a sh*tbox to drive with and he still finished just 12 seconds behind Button. They started side by side on track which further proves my point.
See our F1 related articles too!