FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Just as it says...
By andrew
#314011
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314024
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
By andrew
#314025
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314031
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
By andrew
#314033
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314034
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
You're thinking of Jack.
By Hammer278
#314035
Just saw the movie again in regular theatre....and found out IMAX makes a hell of a difference. :hehe:

Btw, this time I focused more on how the soundtrack goes with the scenes...and I had a clear winner. Goes so well with the scene. :)

By andrew
#314036
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
You're thinking of Jack.
There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314039
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
You're thinking of Jack.
There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.
Yup, I was right in the centre of that. That was scarecrow in batman begins though.
By andrew
#314041
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
stonemonkey wrote:
andrew wrote:
vlad wrote:Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.
The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
Maybe that's just me then.
You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
You're thinking of Jack.
There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.
Yup, I was right in the centre of that. That was scarecrow in batman begins though.
Oops, I was thinking of Batman Begins. :blush:
User avatar
By scotty
#314642
Watched the 1989 Batman movie last night... just not even close to as good as the Nolan films in any shape or form. I do prefer that Batmobile though! :hehe:
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314643
scotty wrote:Watched the 1989 Batman movie last night... just not even close to as good as the Nolan films in any shape or form. I do prefer that Batmobile though! :hehe:
Oh I dunno, how would it do in a game of chicken with a bin lorry?

I watched Batman and Robin last night :( everything about it was terrible.
User avatar
By scotty
#314646
Haha, appauling film!
User avatar
By Jabberwocky
#314671
I thought about watching it, then noticed Balls of Steel was on as well.
By vaptin
#314673
Adventure land could be better. Focused on the wrong theme IMO, the film works best as an oddball v the world comedy than sappy teen romance, or maybe it's personal bias.
  • 1
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 72
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!