FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Just as it says...
By andrew
#314011
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314024
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.
By andrew
#314025
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314031
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.
By andrew
#314033
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.


You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314034
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.


You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!


You're thinking of Jack.
By Hammer278
#314035
Just saw the movie again in regular theatre....and found out IMAX makes a hell of a difference. :hehe:

Btw, this time I focused more on how the soundtrack goes with the scenes...and I had a clear winner. Goes so well with the scene. :)

[youtube]VpfYKpClq1I&feature=relmfu[/youtube]
By andrew
#314036
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.


You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!


You're thinking of Jack.


There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314039
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.


You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!


You're thinking of Jack.


There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.


Yup, I was right in the centre of that. That was scarecrow in batman begins though.
By andrew
#314041
Jack is funny and scary, in the same time. The new one is none of that.


The newer version is a bit over the top and is quite one dimensional.


Maybe just which character you can relate to most. I found Heaths joker more disturbed and disturbing than Jacks.


I don't relate to either. I just prefer Jack Nicholsons version.


Maybe that's just me then.


You relate to the joker? So it was you and your associates that was behind the noxious vapours in Edinburgh!


You're thinking of Jack.


There were noxious vapous involved in The Dark Night wasn't there? Something to do with nerve gas and the water supply.

I was trying to tie it in with the legionaires outbreak in your neck of the woods.


Yup, I was right in the centre of that. That was scarecrow in batman begins though.


Oops, I was thinking of Batman Begins. :blush:
User avatar
By scotty
#314642
Watched the 1989 Batman movie last night... just not even close to as good as the Nolan films in any shape or form. I do prefer that Batmobile though! :hehe:
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#314643
Watched the 1989 Batman movie last night... just not even close to as good as the Nolan films in any shape or form. I do prefer that Batmobile though! :hehe:


Oh I dunno, how would it do in a game of chicken with a bin lorry?

I watched Batman and Robin last night :( everything about it was terrible.
User avatar
By scotty
#314646
Haha, appauling film!
User avatar
By Jabberwocky
#314671
I thought about watching it, then noticed Balls of Steel was on as well.
By vaptin
#314673
Adventure land could be better. Focused on the wrong theme IMO, the film works best as an oddball v the world comedy than sappy teen romance, or maybe it's personal bias.
  • 1
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 72

See our F1 related articles too!