- 18 Apr 12, 21:33#299962
I didn't notice it ealier. Just saw that and thought "eh?"
But I don't see the relevance of citing something that happened a couple of centuries ago. Those were different times where dimplomacy through words was not often, if ever, used. However, were the English not just as bad with the Highland clearances? Comparing modern day so-called terrorism with something from a few 100 years ago is ludicrous. besides, one mans terrorist is anothers freedom fighter.
It doesnt matter whether Scots were terrorists in centuries past.
WTF are you on about? Please elaborate on this.
Scotland was mentioned earlier.And it was to make the point that because terrorism has happenend before its not a reason for it to happen again, its not an answer.
I didn't notice it ealier. Just saw that and thought "eh?"

But I don't see the relevance of citing something that happened a couple of centuries ago. Those were different times where dimplomacy through words was not often, if ever, used. However, were the English not just as bad with the Highland clearances? Comparing modern day so-called terrorism with something from a few 100 years ago is ludicrous. besides, one mans terrorist is anothers freedom fighter.
