FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

Formula One related discussion.
By Hammer278
#285827
bud wrote:That cars advantage was in the aero, if it was all engine why wasn't McLaren winning from round 1?

I'd put my last dollar Brawn still would have blitzed the field in Australia if they were Honda. In fact if they were still Honda they would have had the budget to develop the car through the season unlike with Brawn who fell backwards as the season went on.
Agreed. As far as I'm concerned, Brawn could've used Cosworths and still won the WDC in that car. The double diffuser+aero combination set the Brawns a world apart from the rest, the engine was insignificant at this point.
User avatar
By racechick
#287470
So what is McLaren's plan? They're loosing a lot of high level engineers and designers to Ferari, being luered away by Pat Fry (hope they didnt photocopy any pictures before they went :twisted: ).
They're buying back shares from mercedes but dont appear to be moving forward on their own in house engine.
Do they have something up their sleeve or are they in a spot of bother?

http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2012/01/ ... n-mclaren/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
By What's Burning?
#287473
racechick wrote:So what is McLaren's plan? They're loosing a lot of high level engineers and designers to Ferari, being luered away by Pat Fry (hope they didnt photocopy any pictures before they went :twisted: ).
They're buying back shares from mercedes but dont appear to be moving forward on their own in house engine.
Do they have something up their sleeve or are they in a spot of bother?

http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2012/01/ ... n-mclaren/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In the link it reads;
The change of engine regulations, which is now programmed for the start of 2014 when a new formula will begin with the 2.4-litre V8 engines of today being replaced by 1.6 litre V6 turbos, with energy recovery systems and fuel flow restrictions.
I thought it was supposed to be 2.0 liter V6 turbo?!?!
User avatar
By darwin dali
#287474
What's Burning? wrote:
racechick wrote:So what is McLaren's plan? They're loosing a lot of high level engineers and designers to Ferari, being luered away by Pat Fry (hope they didnt photocopy any pictures before they went :twisted: ).
They're buying back shares from mercedes but dont appear to be moving forward on their own in house engine.
Do they have something up their sleeve or are they in a spot of bother?

http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2012/01/ ... n-mclaren/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In the link it reads;
The change of engine regulations, which is now programmed for the start of 2014 when a new formula will begin with the 2.4-litre V8 engines of today being replaced by 1.6 litre V6 turbos, with energy recovery systems and fuel flow restrictions.
I thought it was supposed to be 2.0 liter V6 turbo?!?!
I don't recall 2.0 liter engines...
By What's Burning?
#287476
^^ yeah, I probably pulled it out my @ss convincing myself since it was the mid point between 1.6 and 2.4 and 4 cylinders versus eight.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#287477
What's Burning? wrote:^^ yeah, I probably pulled it out my @ss convincing myself since it was the mid point between 1.6 and 2.4 and 4 cylinders versus eight.
Yeah, let the riding lawn mower races begin :rolleyes:
By What's Burning?
#287478
darwin dali wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:^^ yeah, I probably pulled it out my @ss convincing myself since it was the mid point between 1.6 and 2.4 and 4 cylinders versus eight.
Yeah, let the riding lawn mower races begin :rolleyes:
By andrew
#287490
darwin dali wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:I thought it was supposed to be 2.0 liter V6 turbo?!?!
I don't recall 2.0 liter engines...
The engines are not going to be made of rubbish!

They are going to be 1.6 litre turbos.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#287500
andrew wrote:If you colonials are going to speak English, you'd be as well spell things in English. It's litre!
Problem is, that's the French spelling, so your British English is quite foufou :P
User avatar
By darwin dali
#287501
andrew wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:I thought it was supposed to be 2.0 liter V6 turbo?!?!
I don't recall 2.0 liter engines...
The engines are not going to be made of rubbish!

They are going to be 1.6 litre turbos.
Rubbish would be litter :doh:
By andrew
#287503
darwin dali wrote:
andrew wrote:
darwin dali wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:I thought it was supposed to be 2.0 liter V6 turbo?!?!
I don't recall 2.0 liter engines...
The engines are not going to be made of rubbish!

They are going to be 1.6 litre turbos.
Rubbish would be litter :doh:
It would still be pronounced litter albeit spelt wrong.
darwin dali wrote:
andrew wrote:If you colonials are going to speak English, you'd be as well spell things in English. It's litre!
Problem is, that's the French spelling, so your British English is quite foufou :P
The French spelling that is also the English spelling from which the American version would be derived from so the American spelling is wrong!
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Williams Support

It has been a really disappointing season for them[…]

Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!