Take F1 back to basics, no fragile tyres, no DRS, no KERS and no ridiculous tyre usage reg's.

I just about prefer last year's so called boring Bridgestone tyres than this years Pirelli, The Pirelli's seem to suit certain drivers because they nurse them better and other reasons where as the Bridgestone's seem to suit nearly every driver and the drivers don't have to worry about nursing them and there for they just drive hard and push on. The 2010 season was much more exciting than 2011 even with the KERS, DRS and fragile Pirelli's, Anyway back on topic with DRS, It either doesn't work at some tracks or we see easy boring overtakes. Get rid of DRS or let the drivers use it whenever they want in the races.
How come? Although in 2010 we had a championship fight, most of the races were downright terrible.
I also preferred the Bridgestone tyres, I like to see drivers pushing the limit lap after lap. Andrew's formula works for me.
As for 2010, seriously bro? 
The competition was intense, so the races were too.
The best thing about 2010 was how close it was in the championship between drivers from Red Bull, McLaren and Ferrari. That was very exciting, and kept everyone on their toes until the very end. Sadly, we lacked that this season, but that's F1... it happens.
As for quality of racing, I disagree that most of the races were "downright terrible" in 2010, far from it. Although crazy races like the Chinese GP this season would only have happened in 2010 if rain had fallen. Now come on guys, you're not all saying that you didn't frigging love the Chinese GP? Or the German or Canadian Grands Prix? Even Barcelona wasn't the utter borefest it usually is this time round! Many positives can still be drawn.
Don't let the fact that the latter few races were dull blur the memories of the tremendously exciting Grands Prix we've enjoyed this season. They weren't in the minority.
