About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
australia99 wrote:Don't be daft! Eddie Jordan couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery with a bunch of homeless chronic alcoholics.racechick wrote:Jordanif only, if only.
QuoththeRaven wrote:Please excuse my cynicism on the matter, but why does everybody think that Ferrari is not in Formula 1 to promote their own brand?Quoted for truth.
I mean, it is their one and only marketing tool. I would go so far as to say that Ferrari cannot leave Formula 1 without taking a massive hit to their image unlike Red Bull which is, when you get down to it, just a drinks company and not a race car company that sells it's cars using the long history of competing in Formula 1 as a works team.
When it no longer makes any marketing or financial sense to do so, Red Bull, like most other companies out to make money, will leave Formula 1. I do not find this unusual. Remember that the team has some very long running deals with suppliers, like engines from Renault until 2016, so it is not like they are going to just up and leave if they get second or third place.
I think that what the article really was very honest. Instead of the usual platitudes about "an ongoing commitment" and "a love of the sport" we got an honest evaluation of what and why Red Bull, the drinks company, is in F1. Just like Ferrari, they are in it to sell their product. Unlike Ferrari, they have lots of other options to do so should this one have run it's course and no longer be viable.
QuoththeRaven wrote:Please excuse my cynicism on the matter, but why does everybody think that Ferrari is not in Formula 1 to promote their own brand?Learn your history, Ferrari are an F1 team first and foremost. Enzo got into the auto business to fund his F1 team.
I mean, it is their one and only marketing tool. I would go so far as to say that Ferrari cannot leave Formula 1 without taking a massive hit to their image unlike Red Bull which is, when you get down to it, just a drinks company and not a race car company that sells it's cars using the long history of competing in Formula 1 as a works team.
When it no longer makes any marketing or financial sense to do so, Red Bull, like most other companies out to make money, will leave Formula 1. I do not find this unusual. Remember that the team has some very long running deals with suppliers, like engines from Renault until 2016, so it is not like they are going to just up and leave if they get second or third place.
I think that what the article really was very honest. Instead of the usual platitudes about "an ongoing commitment" and "a love of the sport" we got an honest evaluation of what and why Red Bull, the drinks company, is in F1. Just like Ferrari, they are in it to sell their product. Unlike Ferrari, they have lots of other options to do so should this one have run it's course and no longer be viable.

bud wrote:Isn't there another thread about Ferrari getting paid too much for their participation in the sport? I wish Williams had some of that as well. IMO a team whose sole purpose is the sport of F1 should get paid more as part of that commitment.LewEngBridewell wrote: Just goes to show... teams like Ferrari, McLaren and Williams are the true racing outfits... they'll stick it through to the end no matter what.They exist for F1 that's their sole purpose.
scotty wrote:I personally find it amazing that Red Bull generate enough ultimate revenue from participating in F1 to make all the expenditure worthwhile...I find it amazing they generate the revenue they do selling the pisswater they can.
bud wrote: Learn your history, Ferrari are an F1 team first and foremost. Enzo got into the auto business to fund his F1 team.That is true. However now Ferrari is now mostly owned by Fiat, if memory serves and old man Enzo is dead and gone.
Ferraris setup has really nothing in common with Redbull who sell a product and bought into F1 to promote said product.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
andrew wrote:dont forget, eddie learn't from this mistake. He made Ferrari pay through their teeth for Irvine, then from memory used the money to finance a new wind tunnel.australia99 wrote:Don't be daft! Eddie Jordan couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery with a bunch of homeless chronic alcoholics.racechick wrote:Jordanif only, if only.
Remember this clown had some young German kid in one of his cars but was too stupid to have a proper contract so the kid very smartly moved to a real team. Jordan went to court but seeing as Schumacher hadn't signed a contract the case was a waste of time.F1 is a professional sport these days with no room for clowns these days.
QuoththeRaven wrote:Ferrari have been in F1 since the first season, they were founded as an F1 team first and foremost. Yes they are now majority owned by Fiat but the Auto division of Ferrari has built up its own reputation over the years I'm not sure it's sales would change if Ferrari were in F1 or not and Being an exotic car make its a niche market at best. Also their biggest market is in the USA and that country isn't exactly F1 mad.bud wrote: Learn your history, Ferrari are an F1 team first and foremost. Enzo got into the auto business to fund his F1 team.That is true. However now Ferrari is now mostly owned by Fiat, if memory serves and old man Enzo is dead and gone.
Ferraris setup has really nothing in common with Redbull who sell a product and bought into F1 to promote said product.
It is now a business that needs to turn a profit.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!