- 03 Oct 11, 12:59#278239
So it was a team order. No rules against those anymore as long as a driver isn't instructed to do anything that'll endanger anyone else like pitch their car into a spin so that their team mate can win the race.
So what if Massa was instructed to help Alonso? It's his job as the number 2 driver to help the number 1 driver. All teams do it! Part of Smedley's role is to help motivate his driver. What is going to motivate a person more? Telling them to destroy an opponents race or asking them politely if they wouldn't mind in being a stout fellow and holding up the other chap?
Mountain out of a molehill is all it is. Would you be having the same amount of hysteria if Smedley had said to Massa "hold up Hmailton"? I doubt it even though it means the same thing. As Denthúl said, you are focussing too much on the word destroy.
These radio tranmissions can be heard by anyone on the pitwall so it is hardly surprising if a bit of fighting talk is slipped in to annoy the opposition. Just posturing and games is all it is. It's being taken far too literally just because an aggressive word was used.
And in answer to your first point the reason I think its a biggie is not because Felippe was instructed to protect Alonso(pathetic as that is) It was becuse he was instructed to destroy anothr drivers race.
So it was a team order. No rules against those anymore as long as a driver isn't instructed to do anything that'll endanger anyone else like pitch their car into a spin so that their team mate can win the race.
So what if Massa was instructed to help Alonso? It's his job as the number 2 driver to help the number 1 driver. All teams do it! Part of Smedley's role is to help motivate his driver. What is going to motivate a person more? Telling them to destroy an opponents race or asking them politely if they wouldn't mind in being a stout fellow and holding up the other chap?
Mountain out of a molehill is all it is. Would you be having the same amount of hysteria if Smedley had said to Massa "hold up Hmailton"? I doubt it even though it means the same thing. As Denthúl said, you are focussing too much on the word destroy.
These radio tranmissions can be heard by anyone on the pitwall so it is hardly surprising if a bit of fighting talk is slipped in to annoy the opposition. Just posturing and games is all it is. It's being taken far too literally just because an aggressive word was used.