FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[andrew]

The perception hasnt become "It's Lewis's fault", the only people that think like that are the fanboys who think everybody is out to get him.
He's been to the stewards a lot this year and they have seen fit to punish him if they think he was to blame, they have a whole heap of data they can access that normal folk dont get to see, if they say it was his fault then chances are then it was.

Did you even read what you wrote about the Webber-Alonso move? "Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc". They didnt touch... No danger/good racing etc, if Lewis done it and they TOUCHED then it would be dangerous, if Alonso and Webber had touched then it was also be dangerous.
Altho i can see why you would say that about Ham touching if was him instead........ He's just no got the skills

[billindenver]

Lets actually get things in percpective here. Lewis is the guy everyone likes to call out for causing accidents. And when he is involved in incidents he is generally unlucky and comes off worse, more often the other car can continue.The perception has become 'Its Lewis' fault'.
Now since Lewis started in F1 four and a half years ago HE'S ONLY TAKEN OUT ONE OTHER DRIVER ON THE RACETRACK!!!! Thats maldonado.

Webbers move round Alonso at Eau Rouge-brilliant. But it relied on a cooperative Alonso and it was whiskers from a touch. Had it gone wrong. Well thats racing.
Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc
For whatever reason lewis is not receiving fair treatment by a growing number of people, some who should know better.

The perception hasnt become "It's Lewis's fault", the only people that think like that are the fanboys who think everybody is out to get him.
He's been to the stewards a lot this year and they have seen fit to punish him if they think he was to blame, they have a whole heap of data they can access that normal folk dont get to see, if they say it was his fault then chances are then it was.

Did you even read what you wrote about the Webber-Alonso move? "Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc". They didnt touch... No danger/good racing etc, if Lewis done it and they TOUCHED then it would be dangerous, if Alonso and Webber had touched then it was also be dangerous.
Altho i can see why you would say that about Ham touching if was him instead........ He's just no got the skills

[andrew]

No danger of originality then?

[racechick]

Lets actually get things in percpective here. Lewis is the guy everyone likes to call out for causing accidents. And when he is involved in incidents he is generally unlucky and comes off worse, more often the other car can continue.The perception has become 'Its Lewis' fault'.
Now since Lewis started in F1 four and a half years ago HE'S ONLY TAKEN OUT ONE OTHER DRIVER ON THE RACETRACK!!!! Thats maldonado.

Webbers move round Alonso at Eau Rouge-brilliant. But it relied on a cooperative Alonso and it was whiskers from a touch. Had it gone wrong. Well thats racing.
Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc
For whatever reason lewis is not receiving fair treatment by a growing number of people, some who should know better.

The perception hasnt become "It's Lewis's fault", the only people that think like that are the fanboys who think everybody is out to get him.
He's been to the stewards a lot this year and they have seen fit to punish him if they think he was to blame, they have a whole heap of data they can access that normal folk dont get to see, if they say it was his fault then chances are then it was.

Did you even read what you wrote about the Webber-Alonso move? "Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc". They didnt touch... No danger/good racing etc, if Lewis done it and they TOUCHED then it would be dangerous, if Alonso and Webber had touched then it was also be dangerous.
Altho i can see why you would say that about Ham touching if was him instead........ He's just no got the skills

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

[bud]

Lets actually get things in percpective here. Lewis is the guy everyone likes to call out for causing accidents. And when he is involved in incidents he is generally unlucky and comes off worse, more often the other car can continue.The perception has become 'Its Lewis' fault'.
Now since Lewis started in F1 four and a half years ago HE'S ONLY TAKEN OUT ONE OTHER DRIVER ON THE RACETRACK!!!! Thats maldonado.

Webbers move round Alonso at Eau Rouge-brilliant. But it relied on a cooperative Alonso and it was whiskers from a touch. Had it gone wrong. Well thats racing.
Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc
For whatever reason lewis is not receiving fair treatment by a growing number of people, some who should know better.

The perception hasnt become "It's Lewis's fault", the only people that think like that are the fanboys who think everybody is out to get him.
He's been to the stewards a lot this year and they have seen fit to punish him if they think he was to blame, they have a whole heap of data they can access that normal folk dont get to see, if they say it was his fault then chances are then it was.

Did you even read what you wrote about the Webber-Alonso move? "Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc". They didnt touch... No danger/good racing etc, if Lewis done it and they TOUCHED then it would be dangerous, if Alonso and Webber had touched then it was also be dangerous.
Altho i can see why you would say that about Ham touching if was him instead........ He's just no got the skills

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

His last ittle dig Kinda makes his whole speech null and void... Proved you right Racechick

[Ballsy]

Lets actually get things in percpective here. Lewis is the guy everyone likes to call out for causing accidents. And when he is involved in incidents he is generally unlucky and comes off worse, more often the other car can continue.The perception has become 'Its Lewis' fault'.
Now since Lewis started in F1 four and a half years ago HE'S ONLY TAKEN OUT ONE OTHER DRIVER ON THE RACETRACK!!!! Thats maldonado.

Webbers move round Alonso at Eau Rouge-brilliant. But it relied on a cooperative Alonso and it was whiskers from a touch. Had it gone wrong. Well thats racing.
Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc
For whatever reason lewis is not receiving fair treatment by a growing number of people, some who should know better.

The perception hasnt become "It's Lewis's fault", the only people that think like that are the fanboys who think everybody is out to get him.
He's been to the stewards a lot this year and they have seen fit to punish him if they think he was to blame, they have a whole heap of data they can access that normal folk dont get to see, if they say it was his fault then chances are then it was.

Did you even read what you wrote about the Webber-Alonso move? "Now imagine the same move by Lewis, or imagine Lewis in Alonso's position; and there's a touch. Uproar. A danger etc etc". They didnt touch... No danger/good racing etc, if Lewis done it and they TOUCHED then it would be dangerous, if Alonso and Webber had touched then it was also be dangerous.
Altho i can see why you would say that about Ham touching if was him instead........ He's just no got the skills

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

Did you not see the smiley at the end of the sentence? That particular smiley is called "haha"...... Hence it was a joke!
I have said before I think Lewis is one of the best drivers out there, he's just making silly mistakes which is a shame because the package he's got is definitely a winning one

[racechick]

[andrew]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

[Hammer278]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

Nobody cares.

[andrew]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

Nobody cares.

And?

[bud]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

Nobody cares.

And?

I care Andy I am half jock after all

[andrew]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

Nobody cares.

And?

I care Andy I am half jock after all

Thank you for your support, I shall always wear it.

[darwin dali]

If you think Lewis hamilton has no overtaking skills, there is no point discusing this with you.

This made me laugh!

Nobody cares.

And?

I care Andy I am half jock after all

[andrew]

^Big dog or very short bloke?

[darwin dali]

^Big dog or very short bloke?

Half, thus...