FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By LewEngBridewell
#267322
I preferred the 1 lap for each driver format, that was 'in the spotlight' stuff!!


That would be awsome, in modern f1 there would be some serious upsets in the pole position


I thought it was a bit boring tbh. Just 1 lap from 1 driver at a time, one after the other isn't as good as the climax at the end of the current system. IMHO anyway.
User avatar
By bud
#267330
I preferred the 1 lap for each driver format, that was 'in the spotlight' stuff!!


That would be awsome, in modern f1 there would be some serious upsets in the pole position


It wasn't that Long ago :hehe:
User avatar
By IceManpjn
#267383
The qualifying format is very exciting for the fans but I think it takes away from the race. The top teams are allowed additional time to improve their times and put distance between them and the lower qualifying teams. While this isn't a big deal for the qualifying it can translate into larger gaps during the race. For instance, from Q1 to Q3 the top teams (top three I believe) reduced their lap times by about 2 seconds (give or take). Granted this is in qualifying trim I promise you some of the teams are using this as a opportunity to work on their race trim. If not they are still getting valuable data that can be applied to the race setups. I think this format contributes to reduce overtaking in the race.


I'd figure they gained far, far, far more data during the three rounds of practice, wherein they run many dozens upon dozens of laps, than they would from a few extra laps under qualifying. The extra 0.003% of data they collect from the additional qualifying running isn't detracting from what happens in the race.

I actually quite like the current qualifying format, to be honest. If they were to change it, to something like one car running their one lap and then that's it (as an example), I don't see me watching it at all.

The top teams get 1-2 seconds faster because in Q1 they use the Harder compound of tyres whilst in Q2 and Q3 they have to use the Soft compound of tyres.


This. The second or two definitely has absolutely nothing to do with running a handful of additional laps in Q2 and Q3. Simply switching from the harder prime to the softer option tire accounts for like 1.5 seconds, give or take depending on the track.

If your beef is against the lower grid teams not being able to test and gather data, the push for additional testing. Why ruin the best qualifying format in all of auto racing?


I personally want the ban on testing lifted.

my point was i'd rather have a more exciting race than qualifying.


Alright, but qualifying isn't the problem. There's always flukes, but as a generalization the fastest guy will start out up front, the next-fastest second, third-fastest third, and so forth, with the slowest guys at the back, and you can't expect a slower guy to surge ahead and overtake the faster guys ahead of them. They can't draft their way through the pack like in NASCAR. If the slower guys want to put the fight to the faster guys up front, they need better cars, not a change in the qualifying format. The Red Bulls, McLarens, and Ferraris aren't out in front because they get to run a few more qualifying laps, but because they're the top teams with the top cars and great drivers. If you give all the cars equal numbers of qualifying laps, you'll still have Red Bulls, McLarens, and Ferraris out in front and Lotus, HRT, and Virgin at the rear.
By What's Burning?
#267384
I preferred the 1 lap for each driver format, that was 'in the spotlight' stuff!!


That would be awsome, in modern f1 there would be some serious upsets in the pole position


I thought it was a bit boring tbh. Just 1 lap from 1 driver at a time, one after the other isn't as good as the climax at the end of the current system. IMHO anyway.


I was watching qualifying for INDY this year (guess there really wasn't anything else on) and I fell asleep. They have the same format, but three laps... more time to fall asleep.
User avatar
By acosmichippo
#267394
really the only problem i have with the current format is that it allows cars to influence each other's flying laps - through in/out laps, crashes, etc.

As far as excitement and spectacle goes, i think it' great.
By What's Burning?
#267430
really the only problem i have with the current format is that it allows cars to influence each other's flying laps - through in/out laps, crashes, etc.


Yeah, the nerve of Perez influencing Hamilton's qualifying lap in Monaco. :hehe:

I don't take too much issue with it, because it does happen in Q1, yet it's not as commons as you'd think. A two or three mile circuit can easily spread out 20 cars. In Q3 the likelihood of it is even less. Unless someone is out to intentionally influence, and that's what the stewards are there for. Anyway with the on track location telemetry they've got the tools to prevent it and that's part of qualifying... to time your lap as to mitigate that potential. If your team can't get that right, then you're likely not challenging for pole to begin with.
User avatar
By Frontrunner
#267433
The current format is the a very good and entertaining but I do miss the 1 lap Shootout format as you can focus on all the drivers laps, If a driver makes a mistake, it will been seen by all.

See our F1 related articles too!