
Yeah, how could someone fall out with Rubens.
In this interview (which I don't think you can see), Lewis confirms he started on a 4 stop:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/formula ... 327370.stm. He also said "Jenson was fair, as always".
Yeah, Jenson stopped in the redbull pitlane, not sure what that had to do with Lewis?
Also in his blog, Ted Kravitz suggested Jenson lost out because he was too slow in the second and third stints. Although Jenson said he was on the wrong strategy.
Yeah sure Hamilton the tire destroyer was going to do a 3 stopper and Jenson smooth as silk a 4 stopper. Believe what you want and I will do the same.
They both started on a three stopper, Lewis went to plan B remember?
Again, Jenson said he pitted too early, that suggests he didn't think he had to come in.
Hamilton was NEVER on a 3 stopper and you can take that to da Bank. That's why he even was mad at McLaren for sending him out twice in Q3,coz he wanted to save a fresh set.
Anyway, McLaren team policy doesn't require Jenson to care about Lewis's strategy over his own.
Ahhh so McLaren don't want their drivers to finish in the best positions possible!? That's why I say McLaren don't deserve Lewis.
McLaren say their happy for their drivers to fight with each other, I don't think that translates into them not wanting to finish into the best position possible. But its up to you if you agree thats the best way for them to finish in the best position possible, if you don't, its the same reason Ferrari swapped Massa and Alonso in Germany, Alonso winning the race was the best position for the WDC.