- 27 Mar 11, 08:47#247216
I can't see why they'd throw the result out, it was clearly damaged, you could see it hanging out grinding on the ground lap after lap
F1 and Motorsport Forums

Jensonb wrote:Vettel and Buemi both Maintained or Gained an Advantage by Exceeding the Track Limits - without penalty.Yes they did.I think the rule is too restrictive. why not just let the cars go anywhere...I mean a wider track. But thats a whole other discussion.
racechick wrote:He confirms he yielded to Adrian twice.Jensonb wrote:Vettel and Buemi both Maintained or Gained an Advantage by Exceeding the Track Limits - without penalty.Yes they did.I think the rule is too restrictive. why not just let the cars go anywhere...I mean a wider track. But thats a whole other discussion.
D'you think Di Resta was 'team ruled'?

Jensonb wrote:Vettel and Buemi both Maintained or Gained an Advantage by Exceeding the Track Limits - without penalty.Yes they both had four wheels off the track at any one time. I really have no problem with it unless they penalize Lewis but let's face it Button should of held off Vettel better than he did.

Ineluke wrote:And at that point everyone knows to stop reading because you've just admitted the point you're about to express is not worth anybody's time.Jensonb wrote:Vettel and Buemi both Maintained or Gained an Advantage by Exceeding the Track Limits - without penalty.Yes they both had four wheels of the track at any one time. I really have no problem with it unless they penalize Lewis...

bud wrote:It wasn't about ballast, if they lose parts they can replace them to meet the weight requirement. The possible issue is the wear on the floor. It shouldn't be an issue though as it's not due to the cars ride height that caused the wear but a damaged part.Thats what I thought. Lewis seemed to be a bit unsure when he was intervewed on the red button about what was going to happen.
bud wrote:It wasn't about ballast, if they lose parts they can replace them to meet the weight requirement. The possible issue is the wear on the floor. It shouldn't be an issue though as it's not due to the cars ride height that caused the wear but a damaged part.What?? I'm saying that the car might have lost ballast and was running 'illegally' aka underweight. This is an issue which the stewards would take seriously, remember how the drivers are supposed to 'pick up' rubber right after crossing the finish line as they might be underweight by 0.5kg or so. Losing ballast isn't a case of decimal points.
Hammer278 wrote:I don't understand..how do you replace the bits when the car is in a race? The issue which I see here is Lewis driving an underweight car as a result of ballast being lost. A car has to be racing as per minimum weight, and I fear the broken floor might have caused the car to cross the minimum weight line.I dont know the rule, but i thought Bud was saying you're allowed to add the weight at the end of bits that have fallen off. at the end not during the race.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!