Bootstrap Framework 3.3.6

Over a dozen reusable components built to provide iconography, dropdowns, input groups, navigation, alerts, and much more...

Formula One related discussion.
#244382
Charlie Whiting defends the MWR

Until I'd read this, I always had believed CW was a reasonable and rational individual. After reading this, I'm left to wonder if he's made off with Bernie's stash of Alzheimer meds and is having a right old time with them.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#244488
Charlie Whiting defends the MWR

Until I'd read this, I always had believed CW was a reasonable and rational individual. After reading this, I'm left to wonder if he's made off with Bernie's stash of Alzheimer meds and is having a right old time with them.

Seems a bit dodgy, ain't that the truth?
User avatar
By f1ea
#244497
I still dont understand when the heck this gadjit is supposed to be used......... 600 m... at the braking point... timing loops.... WTF :confused:

This is good info though:
Q. What other rule changes are outlined for 2011?

CW: - Ban on 'double diffusers'.
- Ban on F-Ducts (driver operated rear wing stall systems).
- More stringent load/deflection tests on the front wing and the front of the floor.
- One additional wheel tether on each wheel.
- Anti-intrusion panels attached to the monocoque around the driver's legs.
- One additional load test on every chassis at a point beneath the driver's seating position.
- Gearboxes will have to last five races instead of four previously.
- Introduction of a 107 per cent minimum qualifying time.
User avatar
By scotty
#244514
I still dont understand when the heck this gadjit is supposed to be used......... 600 m... at the braking point... timing loops.... WTF :confused:


Okay, consider a circuit like Monza as an example. Let's say the ARW zone is between the first and second chicanes. There will be a timing beam just before the first chicane, where the gap is measured. If the following driver is within 1 second at this point, he will be elligible to use the device down the following straight, from a point 600m before the second chicane. Does that make sense?
User avatar
By Frontrunner
#244516
it all good trying to have more overtaking but this MRW isn't the answer, even if the MRW does work well and we see cars overtake on several ocasians it just won't be the same. I like to see overtakes done on merit.
By CarBore
#245384
Under the assumption that the Newey wing will be best? Unless you are referring to Vettel's tendency to be fast in qualifying, in which case I disagree. Pure straight line speed is what the driver has the least input on and is mostly the car
User avatar
By scotty
#245385
Under the assumption that the Newey wing will be best? Unless you are referring to Vettel's tendency to be fast in qualifying, in which case I disagree. Pure straight line speed is what the driver has the least input on and is mostly the car


Assuming that the Red Bull has the most downforce, they'll be able to use the wing in places other cars can't around corners...
#245387
Under the assumption that the Newey wing will be best? Unless you are referring to Vettel's tendency to be fast in qualifying, in which case I disagree. Pure straight line speed is what the driver has the least input on and is mostly the car


Assuming that the Red Bull has the most downforce, they'll be able to use the wing in places other cars can't around corners...


Q is the big question mark... although you'd have to be getting quite a bit of downforce from the diffuser and or mechanical grip in order to be able to enable the MRW. It would be a total fiasco in Qualies if that's the case, the Red Bulls would jut be ahead by greater than 5 or 6 tenths on every track!
User avatar
By scotty
#245391
Under the assumption that the Newey wing will be best? Unless you are referring to Vettel's tendency to be fast in qualifying, in which case I disagree. Pure straight line speed is what the driver has the least input on and is mostly the car


Assuming that the Red Bull has the most downforce, they'll be able to use the wing in places other cars can't around corners...


Q is the big question mark... although you'd have to be getting quite a bit of downforce from the diffuser and or mechanical grip in order to be able to enable the MRW. It would be a total fiasco in Qualies if that's the case, the Red Bulls would jut be ahead by greater than 5 or 6 tenths on every track!


Apparently they were already doing it at times in testing, ie round turn 3 at Barcelona. Thing is, i can't see Quali being anywhere near as important this year!
#245392
Under the assumption that the Newey wing will be best? Unless you are referring to Vettel's tendency to be fast in qualifying, in which case I disagree. Pure straight line speed is what the driver has the least input on and is mostly the car


Assuming that the Red Bull has the most downforce, they'll be able to use the wing in places other cars can't around corners...


Q is the big question mark... although you'd have to be getting quite a bit of downforce from the diffuser and or mechanical grip in order to be able to enable the MRW. It would be a total fiasco in Qualies if that's the case, the Red Bulls would jut be ahead by greater than 5 or 6 tenths on every track!


Apparently they were already doing it at times in testing, ie round turn 3 at Barcelona. Thing is, i can't see Quali being anywhere near as important this year!


Well, we'll get to see one type of race on Saturday and a completely different dynamics to the same car on Sunday.
User avatar
By f1ea
#245395
I still dont understand when the heck this gadjit is supposed to be used......... 600 m... at the braking point... timing loops.... WTF :confused:


Okay, consider a circuit like Monza as an example. Let's say the ARW zone is between the first and second chicanes. There will be a timing beam just before the first chicane, where the gap is measured. If the following driver is within 1 second at this point, he will be elligible to use the device down the following straight, from a point 600m before the second chicane. Does that make sense?


hmmm ok i get it more or less, so it will be usable only in that straight, or will there be timing beams in all corners before the straights, or is it restricted to the one zone only?? also, you have to get within 1sec all without using the wing......
User avatar
By scotty
#245397
I still dont understand when the heck this gadjit is supposed to be used......... 600 m... at the braking point... timing loops.... WTF :confused:


Okay, consider a circuit like Monza as an example. Let's say the ARW zone is between the first and second chicanes. There will be a timing beam just before the first chicane, where the gap is measured. If the following driver is within 1 second at this point, he will be elligible to use the device down the following straight, from a point 600m before the second chicane. Does that make sense?


hmmm ok i get it more or less, so it will be usable only in that straight, or will there be timing beams in all corners before the straights, or is it restricted to the one zone only?? also, you have to get within 1sec all without using the wing......


I believe it is restricted to one zone only, i haven't heard anything to the contrary anyway. So there'll only be the one timing beam for it as far as i know. And yeah, the drivers have to get 1 sec behind without the wing.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!