- 16 Mar 11, 11:20#244350
Quite crazy in bahrain right now...I think they already declared martial law...
F1 and Motorsport Forums
vaptin wrote:What's Burning? wrote:So does the fact that the Saudi's have now sent troops into Bahrain, mean that it was the right decision to cancel the GP last weekend?No, just race under closed conditions with UN peace keeping forces surrounding a 15mile radius centred about the track. Shoot anyone who gets to close. Simple.
Oh, no, lets cancel the grand prix instead. . .
What's Burning? wrote:Yes, we all love sponsors running f1 don't we.vaptin wrote:What's Burning? wrote:So does the fact that the Saudi's have now sent troops into Bahrain, mean that it was the right decision to cancel the GP last weekend?No, just race under closed conditions with UN peace keeping forces surrounding a 15mile radius centred about the track. Shoot anyone who gets to close. Simple.
Oh, no, lets cancel the grand prix instead. . .cause you know... sponsors LOVE to have their brands be associated with a totalitarian military operation.
vaptin wrote:As opposed to Bernie running it? What indication is there that they (Santander for example) don't already have a large say in how F1 is run?What's Burning? wrote:Yes, we all love sponsors running f1 don't we.vaptin wrote:What's Burning? wrote:So does the fact that the Saudi's have now sent troops into Bahrain, mean that it was the right decision to cancel the GP last weekend?No, just race under closed conditions with UN peace keeping forces surrounding a 15mile radius centred about the track. Shoot anyone who gets to close. Simple.
Oh, no, lets cancel the grand prix instead. . .cause you know... sponsors LOVE to have their brands be associated with a totalitarian military operation.
What's Burning? wrote:Don't ask me to prove a negative.vaptin wrote:As opposed to Bernie running it? What indication is there that they (Santander for example) don't already have a large say in how F1 is run?What's Burning? wrote:Yes, we all love sponsors running f1 don't we.vaptin wrote:What's Burning? wrote:So does the fact that the Saudi's have now sent troops into Bahrain, mean that it was the right decision to cancel the GP last weekend?No, just race under closed conditions with UN peace keeping forces surrounding a 15mile radius centred about the track. Shoot anyone who gets to close. Simple.
Oh, no, lets cancel the grand prix instead. . .cause you know... sponsors LOVE to have their brands be associated with a totalitarian military operation.
vaptin wrote:If you don't put the sarcasm smilie you can't have any sarcasm! How can you have any sarcasm without the sarcasm smilie?What's Burning? wrote:Don't ask me to prove a negative.vaptin wrote:As opposed to Bernie running it? What indication is there that they (Santander for example) don't already have a large say in how F1 is run?What's Burning? wrote:Yes, we all love sponsors running f1 don't we.vaptin wrote:What's Burning? wrote:So does the fact that the Saudi's have now sent troops into Bahrain, mean that it was the right decision to cancel the GP last weekend?No, just race under closed conditions with UN peace keeping forces surrounding a 15mile radius centred about the track. Shoot anyone who gets to close. Simple.
Oh, no, lets cancel the grand prix instead. . .cause you know... sponsors LOVE to have their brands be associated with a totalitarian military operation.
--
Err, you know I was being sarcastic don't you?
What's Burning? wrote:If you don't put the sarcasm smilie you can't have any sarcasm! How can you have any sarcasm without the sarcasm smilie?By saying something so preposterous as to defy credibility.

Jensonb wrote:My Pink Floyd reference was too subtle?What's Burning? wrote:If you don't put the sarcasm smilie you can't have any sarcasm! How can you have any sarcasm without the sarcasm smilie?By saying something so preposterous as to defy credibility.
What's Burning? wrote:Oh, I get it now.Jensonb wrote:My Pink Floyd reference was too subtle?What's Burning? wrote:If you don't put the sarcasm smilie you can't have any sarcasm! How can you have any sarcasm without the sarcasm smilie?By saying something so preposterous as to defy credibility.

Protestor's death and rioting rekindles Bahrain fearsFull Story on ESPN F1
While race organisers and Formula One officials have been upbeat about their decision to go ahead with the Bahrain Grand Prix in three weeks time, their fears that the event would lead to an escalation of protests within the kingdom appear to have been realised after a weekend of violence which left one person dead.
Unrest on Saturday escalated after it emerged a 22-year-old had been killed after being hit by a shot from a civilian vehicle following closely behind the police. That triggered more widespread protests, some specifically against the staging of the race, on Sunday and police fought running battles to try to maintain control. They fired teargas into crowds and made a number of arrests.
Hammer278 wrote:You beat me to it by 2 minutes.Now let's be fair to the gnome with a pageboy, the country's leaders bear most of the responsibility.
Seriously, why risk it and insult the country even more by staging a race? There's still time to call it off.....Bernie you old Gnome.
What's Burning? wrote:Please, after seeing how they 'handled' the situation of their own people, reasoning with them is futile. I rather put more faith in a wall....or Bernie.Hammer278 wrote:You beat me to it by 2 minutes.Now let's be fair to the gnome with a pageboy, the country's leaders bear most of the responsibility.
Seriously, why risk it and insult the country even more by staging a race? There's still time to call it off.....Bernie you old Gnome.
Hansy wrote:Why hasn't this race been permanently ditched goes beyond my comprehension...

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!