- 10 Nov 07, 16:04#23638
so to follow your train of thought if i work as an engineer designing the brake system for bmw and move to renault and redesign the system for renault based on my knowledge of what we did at bmw that is legitimate but if i take a drawing of the system with me to renault and once i am there i show the drawing to 15 engineers and we decide that the one at renault is better and we dont change it then reanault are a bunch of cheaters. to you this is the same as if i would have stayed at bmw and passed the information of the brake system to a buddy of mine at renault and whlie i am at it my buddy also asks for the race strategy and 700 pages of information on the car
it doesnt matter if it was known by a 100 people. the information was given to them by a employee of their team who had worked previously at mclaren. in the case of mclaren their employees were recieving and asking for information from an employee of ferrari.
The only material difference in my opinion is that the first case involved two people giving each other information, while the second involved one person bringing information with them. If the Renault transgression is proven, the offence is the same.
so to follow your train of thought if i work as an engineer designing the brake system for bmw and move to renault and redesign the system for renault based on my knowledge of what we did at bmw that is legitimate but if i take a drawing of the system with me to renault and once i am there i show the drawing to 15 engineers and we decide that the one at renault is better and we dont change it then reanault are a bunch of cheaters. to you this is the same as if i would have stayed at bmw and passed the information of the brake system to a buddy of mine at renault and whlie i am at it my buddy also asks for the race strategy and 700 pages of information on the car