- 04 Jan 11, 19:35#232929
Hey spankyham, you might know the answer to this...Regarding how passed despite a crack. Had you heard anything about if the crack came about before (like as a simple manufacturing error) or after the test? Because if was there before, that sounds like a damned impressive result.
The Frome Flyer: Smoother, Smarter, Calmer, Winner.
Jenson Button: Professor, Chauffeur, World Champion Racing Driver.
Something interesting on Ferrari passing their monocoque test so early. As the article mentions there are new composite materials. I think Ferrari submitted much earlier than normal because they have some innovations here - possibly related to some of these newish intelligent materials. As I understand these offer significant construction opportunities for engineers because they feature memories - they can distort to differing shapes yet can memorise their original shapes.
By submitting the chassis much earlier than normal for Ferrari, they could get an OK from the FiA by passing the test. Also, once chassis have passed this test they can't be changed - if Ferrari do have some innovations here it would be hard for other teams to copy in 2011 as the chassis can't be changed. If the FiA had a problem with the Ferrari chassis and its new materials, submitting early would give Ferrari time to change to more conventional materials.That fin would be illegal, for a couple of reasons but the easiest one is that body work isn't allowed to contact the rear wing anymore.
Looks like its overhanging, and close, but also side image to me shows it actually not touching.
Hey spankyham, you might know the answer to this...Regarding how passed despite a crack. Had you heard anything about if the crack came about before (like as a simple manufacturing error) or after the test? Because if was there before, that sounds like a damned impressive result.

The Frome Flyer: Smoother, Smarter, Calmer, Winner.
Jenson Button: Professor, Chauffeur, World Champion Racing Driver.