FORUMula1.com

[spankyham]

I just dont think FA still has "it" like in his younger years!

2005 youngest WDC
2006 >> << *2
2008 youngest WDC
2010 youngest WDC

Are you following me????????????? Dont get lost now

Actually I doubt anyone here can follow your contradicting post.

It seems to me that F1 WDC are getting younger every year,no! I see a pattern developing,thats all! None of that (my driver/your driver)

Well, there you have it, Ferrari, Fernando and Felipe (who's older than Nando) are completely out of the picture for 2011 and beyond.

[vaptin]

Fernando winning another WDC depends primarily on what cars Ferrari produce him. Oh and if they fill the rather gaping strategy hole left by Brawn.

I just dont think FA still has "it" like in his younger years! Seb and Lewis are faster given their cars are somewhat the same in performance!

Raw speed wasn't Fernando's problem this year, it was his errors. He beat Lewis this year despite a McLaren engineer claiming there's was the second fastest car, and Vettel had a faster car than Alonso.

Actually errors and reliability of (others) is what kept him close! This year wasnt even close (otherwise)

I'm just saying Fernando's main reason for not winning it this year was more his early season errors (and of course Ferrari's strategy blunder) rather than simply looking at him and thinking, he's driving too slow (him driving to slow rather than the car being too slow).

Also, as for your stats on the WDC winners, correlation does not equal causation.

[Jack Master]

I believe you’re right again Vaptin.