More BS and trying to pull the wool over people's eyes by Ferrari then. Whats now to stop Ferrari breaking another rule with the thought that the rules will be changed to accomodate the rule break? This lack of backbone by the FIA is annoying in that in the past a rule hasnt been broken but because it was deemed someone had an unfair advantage the person was penalised and a rule introduced. As what happened to Hamilton at Spa 2 years ago.
So now they have gone the other way, a rule was in place, broken by a team in a blatantly obvious manner, got a small fine and the rule changed in their favour. There will be those that say all teams have orders, but they arent carried out so blatantly with one driver deliberately slowing down to let his teammate take the lead. I expect the most annoyed people will be those at Red Bull who have allowed their drivers to race and ended up with one taking out the other. Yet again feel like giving up on F1, if it wasnt for the likes of Hamilton in the sport I think I would call it a day.

That cheered me up no end, of course, controversy fighter all round good guy Hamilton to save the day!
As for the thread, read:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson ... right.htmlAnd Mark Webber says this:
"When you go through it deeply, it's not easy to make a strong stance on this. It wasn't an easy one for Ferrari because Felipe did not have that many points but maybe it was a bit early in the championship.
"If in the future the team has to make a decision like Ferrari have then it's up to them," said the Australian driver.
"McLaren will do the same in the future, let me guarantee you that, if they need to. Ferrrari did that because Felipe had a tough start to the season and Fernando had some momentum behind him.
"If team orders are allowed, I don't think a huge amount changes. The teams will go to each venue with the same cars prepared and do everything they can to win the constructors' championships.
"If they see at any point in the championship you might want to swap positions, then that might happen.
"If you're in a position where you have to do that yourself, it's not ideal, but if you don't like it, go somewhere else. It's not ideal, but that's how it's been for the last 60 years in F1."
Accept team orders (for the championship at least) are a part of f1, and everyones happy. I agree with the idiocy surrounding the trial and 100grand fine, but the fundamental problem with that was a rule which was almost impossible to enforce and a team which (accidentally) pushed that almost impossible to enforce to the limits.
Tell me you only have a problem becuase it was so obvious, and I'll tell you your a hypocrite.
Talking about other rules is also not relevant, the problem is how difficult this rule is to enforce.