About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
MAD MAX wrote: Here's what Damon had to say http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/175 ... SchumacherIt doesn't say very much. He doesn't go into the facts upon which the decision was made.



MAD MAX wrote:Look at the following clip at 20 seconds in. Above the cars even the electronic flag is showing green, is that not proof that the race was live at that point.I totally agree, it's so simple. The race was back on as the safety car was in and the green flags were waving. There is absolutely no rule violation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-jRbao_ ... re=related


EwanM wrote:Hill says he has received hate mail. Will these losers just give it up?
Is this going to be the case when every driver steward makes a decision which is controversial?
E.g.
"Oh Nigel Mansell I hate you, you gave Lewis Hamilton a penalty for blocking in qualifying because you couldn't fit in the 1995 McLaren and you didn't get on with Ron Dennis.
Signed
I should watch more F1"




billindenver wrote:When a decision has millions of dollars/pounds hanging in the balance...there is going to be heat if it is controversial. If you can't stand the heat...stay out of the kitchen. If you can't take the emails, don't put yourself in the position where a decision might be yours. A plea for sympathy after the fact is all the more pathetic. I was on Hill's side when reading the rulebook, but after seeing video of the green flags waving....how a driver of his standing could rule against Schumacher (the devil incarnate) is beyond me.Its not just Hill though.
Gaz wrote:Certainly not....but I have not read any quotes from the other stewards talking to the press. He is keeping himself in the spotlight by talking about it and having been around the press his whole career, he knows this and is enjoying the attention. Its also entirely possible that none of them noticed the green flags during playback. We (the internet experts of F1) have the advantage of hindsight and a lot of spare time to look over video. I applaud them for making an immediate decision rather than spend days deciding. I think they may have gone the wrong way but that is what the appeal process is for. The stewards should be encouraged, if not required, to act quickly like that and if they get it wrong because of the quick action...it should not be held against them. I retract my earlier skepticism and congratulate them on a quick decision...right or wrong.billindenver wrote:When a decision has millions of dollars/pounds hanging in the balance...there is going to be heat if it is controversial. If you can't stand the heat...stay out of the kitchen. If you can't take the emails, don't put yourself in the position where a decision might be yours. A plea for sympathy after the fact is all the more pathetic. I was on Hill's side when reading the rulebook, but after seeing video of the green flags waving....how a driver of his standing could rule against Schumacher (the devil incarnate) is beyond me.Its not just Hill though.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!