Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Sorry but my disorder with emotions also seems to extend to emoticons.
.Sorry but my disorder with emotions also seems to extend to emoticons.
I like that
What absolute rubbish, the earth is only 6,000 years old.
No its not. Its more like 6 billion.Isnt it?
Around 4.5 billion years.
I was quite stunned when I found that out (no I didn't think the earth was 6,000 years old btw), along with the fact that the universe is something like 13.5 billion years old. The earth is about 1/3 the age of the universe! And it took around 4 billion years for life to evolve to it's current state. I used to think that it was possible that countless intelligent civilisations could have risen died off throughout the universe before us but now I see that as far less likely.:thumbup: I will from here on out take anything you say not to be serious or with any merit, sound good
Deal.
What absolute rubbish, the earth is only 6,000 years old.
No its not. Its more like 6 billion.
Around 4.5 billion years.
I was quite stunned when I found that out (no I didn't think the earth was 6,000 years old btw), along with the fact that the universe is something like 13.5 billion years old. The earth is about 1/3 the age of the universe! And it took around 4 billion years for life to evolve to it's current state. I used to think that it was possible that countless intelligent civilisations could have risen died off throughout the universe before us but now I see that as far less likely.:thumbup: I will from here on out take anything you say not to be serious or with any merit, sound good
Deal.
well this universe anyway....
Not really considering physicists now predict more than one universe in which life could have evolved and have civilisations as old as you first suggested.
:thumbup: I will from here on out take anything you say not to be serious or with any merit, sound good
Deal.
Lighten up mate why take everything so seriously? Perhaps a nudge nudge wink wink smilie is needed, hint
.
Why are are you contradicting yourself aswell when you said;What absolute rubbish, the earth is only 6,000 years old.
and then you go on to say:(no I didn't think the earth was 6,000 years old btw]
Not really considering physicists now predict more than one universe in which life could have evolved and have civilisations as old as you first suggested.
Sorry, I was thinking along the lines of the possibility of there also being et life that we could contact, with my previous thought of life coming and going many times and earth being in existance for only a tiny fraction of the age of the universe then I would say there would be quite a large probability but since the earth and life on it covers quite a significant fraction of the age of the universe I'd say that reduces the probability of et life being as abundant. The idea that other universes exist doesn't bother me and while it may be proven mathematically possible I don't think there could be any transfer of information.
Well modern man is relatively young in evolutionary terms. Evolution is a funny thing there's no exact time frame for an advanced civilisation to evolve( I dont even count us as very advanced)
As for other universes and dimensions well there's theories on ETs UFOs etc that they actually come from another dimension! There's a lot that we can't comprehend when it comes to space and time!
Well modern man is relatively young in evolutionary terms. Evolution is a funny thing there's no exact time frame for an advanced civilisation to evolve( I dont even count us as very advanced)
While you can consider that modern man may only have been evolving for maybe 10 or 20 million years or so and that that could have occurred at any time over a period of maybe the last 250 million years of earths existance, to get from the first self replicating compounds to some sort of small rodent or something capable of evolving into man (or equivalent) took several billion years, not only was life evolving during that time but it was also affecting the environment to support later evolution and In my opinion it's quite possible that that stage has to be in the order of billions of years.
.
Yep, but it took several billion years for the slime to crawl out of the water. Not only to evolve to be capable to do that but also to process the atmosphere to protect and sustain itself. That first 3 or 4 billion years of slime may be necessary for the evolution of intelligent life.
Yep, but it took several billion years for the slime to crawl out of the water. Not only to evolve to be capable to do that but also to process the atmosphere to protect and sustain itself. That first 3 or 4 billion years of slime may be necessary for the evolution of intelligent life.
yeah and given we evolved in 65 Million years if you want to say from the end of the Cretaceous when Mammals started to flourish who is to say life elsewhere couldnt have evolved in such short amount of time. Like ive already said there is no step by step guide to evolution, what took x amount of time on this planet doesnt mean it will be the same on another.
yeah youre not getting it, If Mammals had evolved as the dominant species instead of reptiles>dinosaurs then it only took 65 Million years for us to evolved theres 400 million years before that time!
like i said YOU cannot say our planets evolutionary history is the default lineage that all life shall take all over the universe!
my previous thought of life coming and going many times and earth being in existance for only a tiny fraction of the age of the universe then I would say there would be quite a large probability but since the earth and life on it covers quite a significant fraction of the age of the universe I'd say that reduces the probability of et life being as abundant.
See our F1 related articles too!
