About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
I dont know why Smedley is on the list. He's just an engineer thats really good at his job.
Kimi for being sacked even tho hes done a really good job.
I dont know why Smedley is on the list. He's just an engineer thats really good at his job.
I dont know why Smedley is on the list. He's just an engineer thats really good at his job.
Kimi for being sacked even tho hes done a really good job.
Hell, if he comes to Mclaren then it's Ferrari's loss!
I dont know why Smedley is on the list. He's just an engineer thats really good at his job.
Surely a driver is just doing his job: he's paid a hell of a lot of money to get results for the team. What an ignorant and scandalous comment!
I don't see how your post fits together. First, I don't think Button is a poor champion because he didn't win the title how I wanted him to. This is purely your own misunderstanding of my views. To clarify once and for all. Prost, for instance, didn't go flat out in every single race, but he's not a poor champion. Button is a poor champion, however, because he has neither the skill or mentality deserving of the greatest prize in motorsport.
Now, how does this relate to Smedley and Raikkonen? Answer: it does not. And nor are you not taking anything away from Smedley. You just said he's 'just an engineer', tantamount to saying he's not equal to a driver. This is bollocks of epic proportions. For your information, Smedley did extremely well in school, before going onto to do a Masters degree in Mathematics and Engineering from an excellent university, after which he become involved in motorsport. His job is different than Raikkonen's, but it was no less difficult to get there, and it's no less difficult to carry out.
See our F1 related articles too!